What a shame. How much time and €M spent just to deign allow you to do <i>some very specific</i> stuff on their devices (in 5 years at least once the trials and shenanigans settle) ? Obviously it doesn't include the "answering call screening" for example, which requires very privileged APIs accessible only by "system" apps, i.e. the ones preinstalled in the ROM. How about RCS ? Remember RCS the "open" standard replacing SMS ?
Now if only these rulings also covered attestation.
Funnily enough, I think it is in Google's best interest to comply and do the best work they can.
Besides security that they might want to guarantee up to a limit, that would boost Android usage, also including their own hardware.<p>The future lies in a large, local-friendly ecosystem and the hardware to support it.<p>Gate keeping software makes even less sense nowadays.<p>The competition is on compute offering. Cheaper, faster, at scale. They can have a competitive advantage over incumbents if they stay smart.
This is a fabulous ruling and the EU continues (for the moment at least) to be the biggest champion of holding corporations to account and pushing back on entrenched tech power.
I know there are bunch of concerning things like chat control getting pushed through but at least there is a counterbalance in other areas as well.
Very nice, here are the 11 Android features that must be made accessible to third party's: <a href="https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/developer-portal/interoperability/alphabet-specification-proceedings-interoperability-ai-services_en#benefits-for-businesses-and-users" rel="nofollow">https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/developer-portal/in...</a><p>My favorites:<p>> 6. Structured on-device integration<p>> AI services will be able to easily interact with other apps installed on the device and perform tasks on behalf of the user within those apps, for tasks that the apps and the user have chosen to make available to AI services. These tasks include “send a message”, “create a note”, “schedule a meeting”. This includes access to certain Google apps (i.e.Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, Maps, YouTube, Messages and Phone) that Alphabet will make available through operating system-level integration channels.<p>> [...]<p>> For instance, Android implements structured on-device integration through App Functions, which developers can enable for their apps, and which can be accessed by AI services without being reserved anymore for Google services, such as Google Assistant or Gemini.<p>> 7. Screen automation<p>> AI services will be able to automate multi-step tasks within apps, on behalf of the user upon their consent. They will do so by imitating user behaviour in a separate virtual window, which makes it possible for the assistant to complete the task in the background, while the user can do something else. [...]<p>> Android implements screen automation via Computer Control, which can automatically access apps, and which is currently reserved for Google’s services, such as Gemini.<p>> 9. System-level on-device models<p>> AI services will be able to call on existing on-device models (“ODMs”), including the Gemini Nano ODMs, that are part of the DMA designated operating system, already preinstalled on Android devices and already made accessible to third parties. As a result of the measures, third-party AI services will have guarantees of equal access (for example, in terms of performance) to ODMs, as Google’s services. [...]<p>> 10. On-device model implementation<p>> Third parties will be able to install, run and use on-device models (ODMs) under the same hardware‑resource and background‑execution conditions that Google’s own models enjoy, and will allow their ODMs to be shared centrally with other apps. [...]
This is all smoke and mirrors.<p>The core issue is not "Google not allowing a feature", it's that small businesses cannot buy phones, install a patched version of Android without a restriction and sell them to make money.<p>Until this problem is solved, everything else is palliative.
> it's that small businesses cannot buy phones, install a patched version of Android without a restriction<p>Pardon my ignorance; but why would Android need to be patched? Is it because it wouldn't run on the phone hardware otherwise?
What prevents this? I always assumed they could.
So they are gonna add these to AOSP?
Is this ruling related to <a href="https://keepandroidopen.org/" rel="nofollow">https://keepandroidopen.org/</a> at all? It's not clear to me..
Now let's bite the apple.
Stallman was right : without the four freedoms your software owns you rather than vis-a-versa.<p>Interoperability is the key to breaking out of walled gardens and owning your own data and digital self.<p>This is a big win but google will fight back it seems instead of embracing interoperability.<p>It may seem trivial but using a small DSP running a tiny model to provide a battery efficient always on wake up call for home AI is huge.<p>As a carer for elders who rely on AI to use modern devices in the face of their difficulty keeping up with interface changes this bodes well.<p>Gatekeeping AI and the future with hidden features is straight out of the bad old days of M$’s embrace, extend and extinguish.<p>I embraced AI to let my elders control their home and they love being in control but are constantly frustrated with UI changes and often find themselves stuck unable to call me with ‘Alexa call Daniel’ which provides them with hope if they wake stuck in a nightmare.<p>Come on google, please don’t be evil embrace interoperability and the open source community.<p>Well done Eff, Cory Doctorow and the Pirate parties of Europe for this small win
Is "in the EU" the new "in mice"?
Considering it has the same population as the US, are you also mice?
Only if you consider Europeans mice, I guess?
Excellent, now please force them to open up app installation again!