3 comments

  • monocasa5 minutes ago
    Previous related discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49137060">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49137060</a>
  • yjftsjthsd-h39 minutes ago
    Proof assistant kernel, not operating system kernel - in case, like me, you clicked in hoping to debate the merits of microkernels vs monolithic:) Although I suppose there is a significant analogy, since the argument here... if I understood right... is very close to the classic &#x27;and now a small defect in a device driver just panicked the system or gave an attacker root&#x27;, just in math terms.
    • eru17 minutes ago
      Yes, the analogy might help. Though as far as I know the common OS kernel reply &#x27;we have to stick it all in the kernel to achieve performance&#x27; doesn&#x27;t apply to proof assistants.
  • red_trumpet24 minutes ago
    Here is the postmortem of the lean bug: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;leodemoura.github.io&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2026-8-1-postmortem-for-kernel-soundness-bug-14576&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;leodemoura.github.io&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2026-8-1-postmortem-for-ke...</a>