How about we give humans access
They probably already scraped it.
ACM has been leaning heavily into AI-generated content for their journals in the past year, and this article is no exception: it appears to be 100% AI generated and full of LLM verbiage.<p>There's something hilarious about that, but also, snake eating its own tail.
I don't want to be mean but if it's that hard to even recognize that LLMs are even a valid thing that could intersect with your business that you need some kind of campaign for it..<p>It's almost like, "don't hurt yourself unc, we will just search arxiv".
the digital library should have always been open access<p>now it will be fodder for the slop machine<p>(i think that LLMs are going to wreck the peer review system for all but hard-experimental papers)
The real efficacy of the peer review system has always been somewhat questionable. That's a big reason why arxiv is so prominent.
Came to say the same thing. Now remains the time to give the public access to the ACM digital library.
[dead]
TLDR: “we’re going to try to get money from LLM providers for access to our back catalog without getting permission from the authors or providing them with any share of the revenue”.
[flagged]
ACM bureaucrats and AI shills are flagging dissent. Welcome to 2026. The entire Internet is just top down propaganda.