Great, now you can't offload your FE to a CDN.<p>But on serious note, htmx is basically a solution in the search of a problem. It is the new hype.<p>Or rather, a solution that overlooks 2 decades of learnings. Yes, for a small set of projects htmx is okay, but even then, where htmx is ideal, static is king, and once static is not good enough, htmx sooner or later starts to feel like the XAML and BPEL soap.<p>The fundamental problem is that it is pretending to be a declarative language while entirely imperative.
Sounds like you never worked on complex HTMX systems. They're easier to maintain, allow for easy caching of HTML fragments in a page. For higher traffic pages React just fails spectacularly.
This feels like an uninformed, generalized opinion from someone with zero experience on the topic. Have you even used HTMX or a similar approach?<p>Besides the memes, it is absolutely not hype-driven, but hypermedia driven. It asks the question: could HTML be even more powerful than it already is?<p>The creators of HTMX even want to standardize core ideas of HTMX into the official HTML specification: <a href="https://triptychproject.org/" rel="nofollow">https://triptychproject.org/</a> Please read this and reply when you still think it's hype.