7 comments

  • tailscaler20261 hour ago
    Despite the destruction, me-south-1 still has more nines than us-east-1
    • lukewarm70736 minutes ago
      this datacenter appears to be 99.99 percent destroyed
  • loufe1 hour ago
    As an aside: I lack the vocabulary, but man those interactive "stats" cards scream LLM-written to me. No problem with it, necessarily, just something about that style seems to raise a flag in my mind.
    • decimalenough53 minutes ago
      The entire houseofsaud.com site appears to be LLM-generated, I wouldn't trust a single thing it says.
      • Neil4435 minutes ago
        Used for translation maybe? I tried to scan to see which plugins, but it had two responses for me, and the second one was 'off'
      • csomar47 minutes ago
        I wouldn't trust a single thing it says even if it was human-generated.
    • tyleo1 hour ago
      Part of it is the clash with the pages UI. Dark black cards in the middle of a light theme.
  • Neil441 hour ago
    Shows unavailable, last status update 30th April <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;health.aws.amazon.com&#x2F;health&#x2F;status" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;health.aws.amazon.com&#x2F;health&#x2F;status</a>
    • gortok1 hour ago
      Makes me wonder how much use it actually gets if this is the first we’re hearing about it.<p>Edit: Incidentally news of the original strike was posted on HN 5 months ago and flagged, for whatever reason. Why would it be flagged? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47317587">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47317587</a>
      • cobolcomesback12 minutes ago
        There were almost daily posts in HNs front page about it 4 months ago when it first happened, as well as front page headlines on CNN and WSJ and other news outlets, though they quickly got drowned out by all of the other Iran war stories when the war first broke out.<p>This is just one of the popular ones, but there were also tens of posts about it with only 1-10 comments: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47641788">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47641788</a><p>Here’s another popular one: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47632503">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47632503</a><p>The reason it’s not really news this week is because both the Bahrain and the Dubai regions have been effectively non-operational for the last 4 months, so the IRGC saying they destroyed an already-destroyed region is less newsworthy.
      • appreciatorBus1 hour ago
        &gt; Why would it be flagged?<p>Because individual HN users do the flagging and many are tired of the inevitable and pointless Israel v Palestine proxy comment war that predictably erupts on any topic related to the Middle East.
      • oneplane1 hour ago
        It&#x27;s been extensively reported on, and any AWS user that clicks on the health dashboard would also have seen it, even if they don&#x27;t consume from news outlets.<p>As for use it gets: plenty of use, mostly when someone needs to have their worlds close to that area (usually latency or legal reasons). There are a lot of smaller businesses that lost a lot (or maybe even everything) because their never thought they would need to create backups in a different region. Most of that wasn&#x27;t really reported on but instead gets shared on various platforms like Reddit.
        • orwin34 minutes ago
          The only reason we knew about it is that it was one of our network output &#x27;node&#x27;, but I don&#x27;t think I&#x27;ve read anything about it in generalist medias
        • malfist1 hour ago
          Are you implying that something that gets reported on, shouldn&#x27;t be on HN? Also, clearly it wasn&#x27;t that extensive if GP hadn&#x27;t heard about it
          • sjs38233 minutes ago
            I learned about it from HN, a while ago.
      • antonymoose1 hour ago
        Oftentimes discussions get killed not because the source article is bad but because the discussions themselves devolve into flame bait&#x2F;war?
        • gortok1 hour ago
          Having reviewed the comments I don’t see any indication of why it would be flagged for the discussion.
        • spacebacon39 minutes ago
          [dead]
      • dmurray1 hour ago
        &gt; Makes me wonder how much use it actually gets if this is the first we’re hearing about it.<p>Or how good their HA&#x2F;failover strategy must be.<p>Although losing one data centre from an availability zone seems like exactly the kind of issue AWS plan for and handle well, and does not take down the whole AZ. By contrast with &quot;our BGP config got messed up&quot;.
    • self47 minutes ago
      There was a building hit near the data center on the first day of the war and that took down one AZ (unfortunately, two of my three EC2 instances were in that AZ). The hit on April 1 pretty much took it all down. Fortunately I had relatively up-to-date backups (both within 24 hours before each outage) so all I lost was a little email (spam) and some libera chat logs. I&#x27;ve moved to ap-southeast-1, which means trading a ~ 60ms ping to ~ 110ms.
    • lukewarm70738 minutes ago
      me-south-1 is in fact, quite possibly permanently, &quot;offline&quot;.
  • hn7jmxa7oc6 minutes ago
    Not sure I agree but you made me think
  • nttylock8 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • i_idiot48 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • catlover761 hour ago
    [dead]