2 comments

  • embedding-shape19 minutes ago
    &gt; If I want to induce a false positive in TSA&#x27;s airport scanner, I can put a gun-shaped object in my bag. If I want to induce a false positive in Waymo&#x27;s stop sign detection system, I can paint my own sign and put it up on a pole.<p>Holy strawman-batman, not only does the founder of Pangram not have a proper response to the actual criticisms, he feels the need to completely make up very different situations to try to illustrate some completely different point... I guess good job of the founder to engage at all, as deBoer does bring up a lot of valid points and criticisms of why people really shouldn&#x27;t rely on &quot;tools&quot; like Pangram, too bad the founder failed completely at addressing the more serious points, and instead just chose to say &quot;Well, there will be false-positives, what can you do?&quot;.
  • achileas29 minutes ago
    Can something be broken that never actually worked?
    • sscaryterry19 minutes ago
      That is indeed the question. The little bit I tried Pangram, it gave me unpredictable and surprising results.