4 comments

  • avidiax34 minutes ago
    I think there are startups making a similar sort of engine for general aviation. It&#x27;s good to see that there is development of the same idea for commercial aviation.<p>This isn&#x27;t like a hybrid car. It&#x27;s a parallel hybrid, where the gas engine is just big enough for efficient cruise at altitude, and the electric motor&#x2F;generator provides extra power for takeoff and ascent (or go-around power), and then charges slowly during cruise if needed.<p>This means that the battery is quite small and light, having only enough charge to take off and get to altitude.<p>I suspect that this system probably improves safety as well, if architected properly. If one or both of the gas engines fail, so long as they are not seized, that electric motor can still provide some power for diversion.
    • kspacewalk20 minutes ago
      &gt;This isn&#x27;t like a hybrid car. It&#x27;s a parallel hybrid, where the gas engine is just big enough for efficient cruise at altitude, and the electric motor&#x2F;generator provides extra power for takeoff and ascent (or go-around power), and then charges slowly during cruise if needed.<p>Isn&#x27;t that exactly what hybrid cars (e.g. Prius) are? Extremely efficient gas engine for highway cruising, but insufficient for acceleration, which is aided by electric motors?
    • SoftTalker26 minutes ago
      The fuel burn of take-off and climb substantially lightens the aircraft for cruise. Electric batteries have no such effect, you&#x27;re carrying all that dead weight for the rest of the flight. This reduces the passenger or cargo capacity of the aircraft, which reduces potential revenue.<p>And what if you need two go-arounds?
      • xattt7 minutes ago
        Exactly. A hybrid passenger car can tolerate unpredictable power output that may come with an auxiliary power setup that may or may not be available when stronger dynamics are called for.<p>A plane doesn’t have this luxury and needs predictable output. The fossil fuel engine either needs a sacrificial “overboost” mode for emergencies (at the cost of wear&#x2F;long-term longevity), or has to be sized for full power at the ultimate cost of efficiency.
      • 0cf8612b2e1e12 minutes ago
        Energy density of liquid fuels cannot be beat by batteries, so this is not competitive if you are looking to maximize cargo. However, there are plenty of short haul flights: private jets, island hopping, regional routes where you need to move little mass.
  • Someone1 hour ago
    Not “30% fuel efficiency”, but an improvement of 30%.<p>FTA: <i>“The project aims to demonstrate up to 30% improved fuel efficiency for a typical 250-nautical-mile regional turboprop mission”</i>
    • c0n5pir4cy18 minutes ago
      I was so confused by the title - I thought jets were fairly efficient at ~40%-50% of theoretical maximum and turbofans can&#x27;t be that far behind. It would maybe make sense for a single prop aircraft.<p>30% improvement makes much more sense.
  • soperj25 minutes ago
    Only AI stories show up now, so they had to call it an Ai craft I guess.
  • xnx44 minutes ago
    [dead]