The team has been on a roll lately with massive fixes &
improvements.<p>Like last months announcement of over 500 fixes.<p><a href="https://webkit.org/blog/17967/news-from-wwdc26-webkit-in-safari-27-beta/" rel="nofollow">https://webkit.org/blog/17967/news-from-wwdc26-webkit-in-saf...</a>
And they recently released the Safari MCP in STP as well.<p><a href="https://webkit.org/blog/18136/introducing-the-safari-mcp-server-for-web-developers/" rel="nofollow">https://webkit.org/blog/18136/introducing-the-safari-mcp-ser...</a><p>Looks like the Safari MCP is also now available in the most recent Golden Gate beta part of system Safari:<p><a href="https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-developer-tools/connecting-an-ai-agent-to-safari" rel="nofollow">https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-developer-t...</a>
Since they nixed uBlock Origin Safari has not been a serious web browser to me. No amount of technology can make up for it.
I've been using uBlock Origin Lite on Safari with no issues.<p><a href="https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ublock-origin-lite/id6745342698">https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ublock-origin-lite/id674534269...</a>
I use Adguard/wipr to great success. Why's uBlock Origin better? Also, wipr now has filtr, which provides URL filtering at the macOS level, so it's as efficient as it gets.
Seconded for Wipr. It's my favorite adblocker I've tried yet (although 1Blocker is also really nice). And if the author sells it to some creepy company, the Safari API means that the new owner can't spy on my viewing. I'm not sure how it could be materially improved by using less privacy-respecting APIs.
> the new owner can't spy on my viewing<p>Quick question: how do you distinguish content blocker extensions from regular extensions? All the Adblockers I know have to use both to be effective at hiding ads, especially on YouTube.<p>In that case, the new owner can still do the spying.
I use AdGuard, Wipr, and uBlock Origin Lite on my iPhone, and uBlock Origin on desktop.<p>I swear there are little gaps in each that the others get, but they're very minor. When uBlock Origin Lote recently released on iOS (within the last year), I noticed a few more things blocked. I also prefer the custom element removal or uBlock and can reuse my desktop filters.<p>It's free, so I'd recommend adding it as an addition to the bunch.
I think the limitations are similar to the manifest v3 issues that the Chrome version has. Specifically, you (the ad blocker) send the browser a list of sites to block, instead you blocking them yourself. That means it's way harder to do clever things like scriptlet injection to find ads and get around adblock detection.
1Blocker has been rock solid for me. Got it after reading about it on Daring Fireball and now I can’t use a Mac without it.
<a href="https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts</a>
Anybody know how to get Safari to “sanitize” on shutdown (delete cookies, cache, etc), except for whitelisted domains? After lots of fiddling I’ve realized this is probably the best privacy/convenience compromise for me, but Safari is the only browser I can’t even find a plugin to do it in.
s/Safari/Firefox/ and it is super simple to do this. I know that's not helpful to the question as asked, but possibly a better answer???<p>As for Safari, closest I see is Preferences -> General -> Remove History Items. It has options ranging from After One Day, one week, one month, never. I don't see an option for at quit like FF has.
Does this help stable Safari in any way? I have a WebKit bug I’m tracking that’s fixed in STP but not in stable and it seems like there’s no telling whether it’ll ever land.
It'll land eventually. They always do, though maybe months down the road. But of course Apple won't preannounce its plans, and unfortunately I'm not aware of a way to track WebKit commits in specific Safari releases.
Please add way to maximize the window. I rage quit when it goes fullscreen or just tall.
Please, can we put the "Disable Javascript" menu back in the Developer menu
The one feature I would love to see is WebSerial support, now that Firefox has it too.
Wonder if they will ever fix upload progress using XHR, pretty annoying to not be able show accurate progress to the user when using larger chunk sizes:<p><a href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277286" rel="nofollow">https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277286</a>
This update fixed some web inspector bugs that I reported, but I can't use it because Safari Technology Preview inexplicably supports fewer macOS versions than Safari itself, i.e., no longer Sequoia.
It’s impressive that pinch-zooming reddit.com in-out-in-out has reliably crashed ios safari for at least a few years already. One would assume Apple gets telemetry from iphone default browser crashes, and reddit seems important enough to warrant a fix
This was fixed but then reverted. No further updates 3 months later. <a href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305622" rel="nofollow">https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305622</a><p>Not sure how this comment is related to Safari Technology Preview, though, which is Mac-only.
I cannot use a browser that is owned by a company who's financial model is dependent upon browsers being nerfed.<p>Apple and Google have far too many incentives to wall garden browsers, Apple due to the app store, Google due to advertising.<p>Independent browsers are the only safe path forward.
Well this preview includes many changes made to WebKit which Kagi, a so called independent browser, depends on. It's good news for you.
You're correct. Which makes it all the more inscrutable that the Firefox team doesn't embrace PWA's as a differentiator.
What did they nerf
Apple: adblocking, PWA being put in a odd spot, surely to be followed by a post "nobody was using it" before being removed, if they mention it at all.<p>Google: ad blocking
PWA for starters?
They are not interested in Indie devs anyways. Might as well let us use PWA no?
After being so disappointed by Tahoe and the whole Alan Dye era, it’s great to see Apple getting their mojo back. Golden Gate is shaping up to be a great release.