8 comments

  • 102317625 minutes ago
    AI for his own pundit profession is not allowed but &quot;open source hackers do amazing things with AI&quot;?<p>He evidently has no clue about open source (people just plagiarize with AI and don&#x27;t do amazing things).<p>If he wants to build resistance as stated in the last paragraphs maybe he should be a bit more careful.
    • SequoiaHope13 minutes ago
      Plenty of people are doing novel hard work with AI in open source: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=48867961">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=48867961</a>
  • Sharlin6 minutes ago
    (2025)
  • jason_s1 hour ago
    Darn, I meant to link to <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;doctorow.medium.com&#x2F;https-pluralistic-net-2025-09-11-vulgar-thatcherism-there-is-an-alternative-f1428b42a8fd" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;doctorow.medium.com&#x2F;https-pluralistic-net-2025-09-11...</a> which is easier to read because of the typeface.
  • delichon1 hour ago
    &gt; A reverse centaur is a machine that uses a human being as its assistant<p>So like a political, military or religious machine does. We&#x27;re already bred for it. We&#x27;re Konrad Lorenz&#x27;s geese, desperate to be led. It&#x27;s the path of least resistance.
  • mmooss37 minutes ago
    &gt; This is a political act of resistance. Margaret Thatcher&#x27;s motto, after all, was &quot;There is no alternative,&quot; by which she meant, &quot;Stop trying to think of alternatives.&quot; The bully&#x27;s trick is to present your defeat as a fait accompli: &quot;Resistance is futile.&quot;<p>More broadly, that trick is the most effective and important today: No matter the issue, people - including on HN - will tell you how powerless they are and how pointless it is. It&#x27;s such a social norm that they will actively resist and attack anyone who violates it and suggests otherwise - goodness forbid you have hope, an idea, or want to do something. I see many adopt bizarrely false perspectives and opinions for which the only sensible explanation (IMHO) is they are strong defenses against action and empowerment - many&#x2F;most won&#x27;t even talk about serious issues like climate change (see - I bet you&#x27;re triggered by the suggestion of discussing it).<p>People never accomplish anything without believing in it first. It&#x27;s old, basic military psyops to preach hopelessness to the enemy soldiers, in dropped pamphlets, radio broadcasts, through propaganda campaigns. Sorry, I forgot - we can&#x27;t talk about those things either.<p>Until people believe, nothing will change. When they believe, everything will change. That&#x27;s why there is so much impetus toward despair.
    • skybrian9 minutes ago
      I don&#x27;t find empty platitudes like &quot;you can just do things&quot; all that inspiring. I prefer seeing a specific example of something you could do and an explanation about why it might help.
  • hattmall1 hour ago
    Great analogy and really good points. I&#x27;m hopeful for a &quot;slow pop&quot; on the bubble though but we&#x27;ll see! Very nice and so much easier to actually read a non-ai generated article too.
    • DonHopkins43 minutes ago
      I feel so much less immiserated and precaratized.
  • not-a-llm19 minutes ago
    [dead]