9 comments

  • cakehonolulu7 hours ago
    This is a deep dive on what is necessary to get Linux on the 68000-based Atari Jaguar. No specialized hardware&#x2F;flash carts. All runs within the original hardware vision (2 megabytes of RAM) and gets to a Busybox shell. Linux repository with the changes: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;cakehonolulu&#x2F;linux_jag" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;cakehonolulu&#x2F;linux_jag</a>
    • tclancy4 hours ago
      On of the few things where getting Doom to run on it wouldn’t be that cool. But I love the post, except for the part where you reminded me I was old by acting like no one remembers that thing.
      • jonhohle1 hour ago
        But… there was a commercial port of Doom to the Jaguar.
    • jambalaya85 hours ago
      Might be fun to run this as a barebones router.
      • cakehonolulu5 hours ago
        I&#x27;ve actually thought of that, but the memory space is so limited that I feel it&#x27;d be impossible. Also considering the fact that no official memory banking solutions exist for the Jaguar... maybe it&#x27;d be an interesting technical challenge to have a custom mapper that can do both ROM and RAM.
  • boznz5 hours ago
    Still occasionally bring out my old jaguar for Alien vs Predator to try and remember what the excitement was all about, but as to putting Linux on it, amazing effort, but I think I&#x27;m going to pass :-)
    • cakehonolulu5 hours ago
      Not that I blame you... in comparison with pretty much the rest of cartridge-based systems, the available flash cart is priced higher (And AFAIK no DIY open-source ones exist). AvP is one of the best games to play on the system, it was future technology at the time it came out.
  • coupdejarnac5 hours ago
    Surely I must have seen someone do this already on Slashdot like 25 years ago. Cheers for using a recent kernel though, that&#x27;s neat.
    • cakehonolulu5 hours ago
      Hi! Thanks! Though&#x27; I must say that it also helped lots that there&#x27;s still m68k (Heck, even base 68000) arch code on upstream Linux...!
  • jdswain1 hour ago
    It should be possible to build a custom cartridge to use some of that 8MB address space for RAM.
  • LogicFailsMe4 hours ago
    The pro move would be getting the Jaguar development tools with their assemblers for the GPU (yes, the Jaguar had a GPU) and the DSP up and running. With just the 68000 it&#x27;s kind of a glorified Atari ST as a console.
    • cakehonolulu4 hours ago
      I think it could be feasible (Like, embedding the utils), but I&#x27;m not too sure how I&#x27;d handle the &quot;upload&quot; of the RISC code for the Tom (While at the same time it&#x27;s driving the Linux console) and similar...
      • LogicFailsMe4 hours ago
        We used to use the blitter for that and then there was a memory location to write to to initiate execution of what was uploaded. The Jaguar developer docs are available online if you haven&#x27;t seen them.<p>Once the GPU or the DSP was running. You could then chain overlays together by running to a location in the GPU itself from which you called the blitter to upload the next segment and then you could just jump to its first instruction. I believe later compilers enabled just running the GPU from main RAM but it has been decades.<p>It was unwittingly extremely useful mental preparation for programming in cuda a decade later.
        • cakehonolulu3 hours ago
          Ah yes, I&#x27;m more worried about the actual limits of what the combination of Linux + the initramfs can let us do (Memory wise, mostly).<p>In theory it should be feasible but I&#x27;m not too sure how you&#x27;d &quot;adapt&quot; the way of doing things within Linux; the environment is very limited and I can&#x27;t think of a way to cleanly make the Tom more &quot;accessible&quot; (While again, Tom is already executing the object lists to drive the Linux console). Doesn&#x27;t help that it&#x27;d need additional afterthought not to trip it up with one of the many hardware erratas both Tom &amp; Jerry had...
  • chiffre011 hour ago
    Am I the only one who clicks on these kind of articles holding out hope to see the glimmer of Linux on an actual CRT from composit outputs?<p>But it&#x27;s always just screen shots from an emulator...
  • basilikum6 hours ago
    How long does it take to boot?
    • cakehonolulu6 hours ago
      About a minute and a half. It varies by 2~ seconds at most. Could possibly be related to how Linux does the calibrate_delay() stuff? (And well, I&#x27;m also not too sure on how deterministic it&#x27;s supposed to be in terms of time).
      • MPSimmons5 hours ago
        Honestly not that far off from my 486 DX2&#x2F;66 back in the day
  • hogehoge513 hours ago
    &gt; The Motorola 68000<p>&gt; Overall, it got lots of traction commercially; it ....<p>Before ARM the m68k was possibly the most deployed processor architecture in history. In the late 1990s it was in printers, cars, personal digital assistants, erc, as well as all the home computers, arcades and unix workstations it found it&#x27;s way into in the 1980s and early 1990s.<p>It&#x27;s sucessor, the Coldfire, could have taken ARMs place...<p>Probably this is the reason it&#x27;s still in the Linux source tree!
  • tangsoupgallery56 minutes ago
    [flagged]