4 comments

  • iam-TJ1 hour ago
    Most likely Hydrazine propellant tanks:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.space-propulsion.com&#x2F;spacecraft-propulsion&#x2F;hydrazine-tanks&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.space-propulsion.com&#x2F;spacecraft-propulsion&#x2F;hydra...</a>
    • jackyinger1 hour ago
      Even if they aren’t, it’s best to assume they are and stay the fuck away. Hydrazine is nasty
  • pentaphobe1 hour ago
    Non-paywall link at a more legit news source<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;australia-news&#x2F;2026&#x2F;jul&#x2F;05&#x2F;mysterious-debris-found-on-queensland-beaches-could-be-space-balls-and-may-contain-toxic-rocket-fuel" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;australia-news&#x2F;2026&#x2F;jul&#x2F;05&#x2F;myste...</a>
    • xattt1 hour ago
      It’s propellant tanks, saved you a click.
  • throwaway274481 hour ago
    &quot;Expert&quot; is a term used when no convincing evidence of expertise can be provided
  • protocolture1 hour ago
    &gt;Space Balls<p>Not like, guerilla marketing for the new movie?
    • seemaze1 hour ago
      May the Schwartz be with you.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=48711604">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=48711604</a>