9 comments

  • msisk61 minute ago
    I recently moved to the St. Louis area for a software job at Boeing. I&#x27;m actually in a nice quiet neighborhood in St. Charles right under the flight path for planes landing at Lambert Field.<p>The fireworks last night were insane. All around me folks were setting off commercial grade fireworks bursting hundreds of feet in the air. The house was shaking, my dogs were freaking out, one of them had a seizure. The air was filled with smoke and smelled of gun powder. It was one of the craziest things I&#x27;ve ever experienced.<p>Next year I&#x27;ll definitely be planning an out-of-town vacation for the 4th to some location with firework restrictions.<p>I don&#x27;t know what the planes were doing; I didn&#x27;t hear or see any landing with all the smoke and noise.
  • cogogo1 hour ago
    Off topic but I went to a local town’s medium-sized professional fireworks show this weekend and there were none of those small flash really loud fireworks that shake you to the core. Not even in the grand finale. Oddly they are what I enjoy most. Have they gone out of fashion or do they mess too much with pets?
    • AnimalMuppet3 minutes ago
      I believe those are called &quot;salutes&quot;.
    • pylua11 minutes ago
      You mean mortars ?
    • consensus147 minutes ago
      They sure haven&#x27;t gone out of fashion on the streets of SF. My ears were ringing!
    • 2OEH8eoCRo056 minutes ago
      I miss those too. I remember as a kid one display that shot a bunch of really bright white flare-like fireworks that were blinding and hung in the sky followed by dozens of those small but loud ones and it was memorable.
  • bluedino1 hour ago
    They really should be controlled a lot more - a nearby house was hit by some sort of Roman candle thing and completely burned down the other night.<p>There was at least a lot less &quot;illegal fireworks&quot; when people had the drive two states away to buy them.
    • skybrian1 minute ago
      [delayed]
    • SoftTalker1 hour ago
      Yeah not sure why that changed, when I was a kid you could only get sparklers and small stuff that stayed on the ground. Today I could get everything for a near-professional show if I wanted to spend the money.
      • Loughla1 hour ago
        When I was a kid you could get actual m80&#x27;s that were like a quarter stick of dynamite. Now you can only get little firecrackers that don&#x27;t even blow up little green army men.<p>It&#x27;s really dependent on your state laws. My state allows fireworks, so you can get most things but they are very limited in size and explosive content.<p>What it amounts to is that most cities&#x2F;counties don&#x27;t enforce their existing laws in this area because people would have a shit fit, and they would arrest so many people that it&#x27;s kind of impossible.<p>Something something banning things doesn&#x27;t really work to do anything but make criminals out of every day people.
        • jandrewrogers32 minutes ago
          &gt; actual m80&#x27;s that were like a quarter stick of dynamite<p>Not even close.<p>A military M80 [0] is ~5g of flash powder, an inconsequential amount of low-explosive albeit enough to seriously injure yourself. The consumer &quot;M80&quot; are even weaker. These are used to simulate real explosions by the military.<p>The smallest standardized military demolition charge contains ~110g of TNT, in a similar small cylindrical format. There are multiple orders of magnitude difference in power between an M80 and these demolition charges.<p>A &quot;quarter stick of dynamite&quot; isn&#x27;t a standard thing. But if it was, it would probably come in around 50g of TNT equivalent.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;M-80_(explosive)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;M-80_(explosive)</a>
        • jtbayly43 minutes ago
          M80s were more like 1&#x2F;8th of a stick, I think. My uncle bought quarter sticks of dynamite one time. Wow. Quite a bit bigger and louder than an M80, and M80s were LOUD! My dad&#x27;s cousin blew off most of his thumb and parts of several fingers with one. It was old, and it had a flash fuse. He was planning to toss it, but it went off instantly. (Don&#x27;t hold fireworks when you are lighting them.)<p>A couple of years ago my brother got some flat triangles from a guy on the side of the road. First thing I&#x27;ve seen in years that was like an M80. We put a flat soccer ball over one, and it went 50 feet in the air. Very fun.
      • fc417fc80256 minutes ago
        &gt; Today I could get everything for a near-professional show if I wanted to spend the money.<p>Not unless you&#x27;re purchasing on the black market or (illegally) manufacturing it yourself.† The professional stuff is substantially larger than anything sold on the consumer market.<p>† Which is surprisingly trivial to do BTW but please be extremely cautious and <i>very thoroughly</i> master the underlying theory if you decide to go that route.
        • jtbayly49 minutes ago
          I&#x27;m not sure if being homemade was the reason, but I just heard about a medflight for somebody hit by a homemade firework.<p>I say this as somebody with a <i>book</i> on how to make them, but I&#x27;ve always been a bit too scared to try.
          • fc417fc80234 minutes ago
            Being homemade is (almost) never in and of itself a reason. A lack of knowledge or judgment certainly can be. However often the motivation for DIY is to circumvent regulations to go big but of course one of the primary reasons for such regulations is that the associated consequences when things go wrong are dire. The story could well have turned out the same even if the item had been purchased from a reputable vendor. There&#x27;s a very good reason the professional shows use barges or large fields and set up a huge exclusion zone around them.
      • topgrain249 minutes ago
        Did you move? There are huge differences between states in what’s available, all the way from “just sparklers and other tiny stuff that doesn’t fly” up to “anything that doesn’t require an explosives license”, and within states areas near cities often restrict fireworks sales.
        • lazide34 minutes ago
          Some places, I’m pretty sure they just waive the explosives license too.
      • andrewinardeer1 hour ago
        Capitalism. Get rich or die trying.
    • fc417fc80222 minutes ago
      Rather than regulate fireworks out of existence wouldn&#x27;t it be better to fix the problem at the root? Why do we permit such fire prone housing to be built just to save a few dollars?
      • infecto12 minutes ago
        What alternative do you propose?
  • linzhangrun12 minutes ago
    Anti-aircraft artillery...
  • userbinator48 minutes ago
    <i>Delta said Sunday a post-flight inspection showed no damage to the aircraft.</i><p>Not surprising, as a firework is designed to disintegrate and the outer surface of a plane is not flammable. Bird strikes are probably a higher risk.
    • 7bees37 minutes ago
      Many fireworks are designed to <i>explode at altitude</i>. The biggest risk is probably if the firework is ingested into an engine (also a major risk for bird strikes).
      • fc417fc80229 minutes ago
        Given the sheer quantity of energy that&#x27;s already being continuously released in an engine would a small firework actually pose more danger than a bird? There&#x27;s no bones in a firework after all.
      • lazide36 minutes ago
        99% of them also don’t have enough explosive force to do more than damage a hand.
  • ButlerianJihad1 hour ago
    Fun fact: “Midway” is also the name of an American manufacturer of video and pinball games, and a Pacific theater of war in World War II, the most important victory in US Naval history. (The airport took this name in July 1949, according to the English Wikipedia.)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20080414001228if_&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.flychicago.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;MDWVisitorsGuide2005Revised.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20080414001228if_&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fly...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;World_Cup_Soccer_(pinball)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;World_Cup_Soccer_(pinball)</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Two_Tigers_(video_game)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Two_Tigers_(video_game)</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Rampage_(video_game)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Rampage_(video_game)</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Terminator_2:_Judgment_Day_(arcade_game)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Terminator_2:_Judgment_Day_(ar...</a><p>It’s also the name of a district&#x2F;neighborhood of San Diego which takes its name from Midway Drive, particularly where it intersects with Rosecrans St.<p>Okay, “Midway” is a lot of things.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Midway" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Midway</a>
    • pezezin56 minutes ago
      Midway&#x27;s most famous and controversial game is, without a doubt, Mortal Kombat.
  • OsrsNeedsf2P1 hour ago
    Am I the only one who thinks the risks are worth the reward? People are celebrating, kids are having fun. Yes a few people blow their hands off, but are we going to remove everything, one by one, in the name of safety?
    • anon700059 minutes ago
      Come on, it’s not a choice between complete anarchy and complete restriction.<p>It is very, very fair for society to be like “hm I think X activity is easy to abuse in a way that hurts innocent bystanders,” and then limits the activity to people with licenses and training or things like that.<p>Like no, it’s totally not cool to give a free pass to people who are putting other people’s lives and homes at risk. How would you feel if your house burned down because your neighbor did something stupid?<p>I don’t care if it’s just your own life at risk. But you’re essentially saying that people should be free to <i>play around with explosive devices</i> in dense city neighborhoods. Fuck no, it’s fucking concerning to have an explosion rattle your windows. The people most likely to do this shit in the streets have no clue what they’re doing.
      • Xirdus32 minutes ago
        &gt; How would you feel if your house burned down because your neighbor did something stupid?<p>Probably the same way I&#x27;d feel if it burned down because my neighbor did some other stupid thing, like drive into it with a truck or try stealing electricity. There would be many feelings probably, but none of them would be &quot;trucks&#x2F;DIY should be illegal&quot;.
      • fc417fc80240 minutes ago
        You are arguing against a straw man. It was never claimed or even implied that society can&#x27;t or shouldn&#x27;t regulate activities that cause harm. The cost benefit tradeoff in this specific instance was called into question and the broader implications of a consistent application of the same bar across all of society was inquired about.<p>&gt; you’re essentially saying that people should be free to play around with explosive devices in dense city neighborhoods. Fuck no, it’s fucking concerning to have an explosion rattle your windows.<p>This is nothing more than emotional grandstanding. You could construct similar rants against a canister of gas or bottle of starter fluid. Obviously how you use the thing is important.<p>Lest you miss my point or think I miss the mark there are video footage of clueless people nearly killing themselves and others through entirely avoidable mishaps with gasoline abound.<p>The question is the amount of knowledge and judgment required, the likelihood of mishap, and the size of the consequences when one inevitably happens. Regulation needs to balance these things against utility and personal freedom.
    • consensus150 minutes ago
      You&#x27;re not the only one. There are few things I hate more than safetyists.
  • zamalek2 hours ago
    I loved playing with fireworks as a kid, and surprisingly have all appendages and senses intact, I even considered pyro as a job - so I definitely get the appeal.<p>I just think it&#x27;s time that we left it to the professionals. Unless you are engaging in science or physics, I don&#x27;t see the value in letting them off yourself.<p>~~It&#x27;s also weird that America&#x27;s birthday is celebrated using a Chinese invention.~~ Edit: bad point, I stand corrected.
    • afavour1 hour ago
      &gt; It&#x27;s also weird that America&#x27;s birthday is celebrated using a Chinese invention.<p>Not really. America is an amalgamation of all the countries and cultures that emigrated to it. It’s one of the best things about it.
    • dullcrisp2 hours ago
      That’s such a strange thing to say. Should we only use things invented in the last 300 years on the 4th of July?
      • netsharc1 hour ago
        Now I wonder who invented wheat, or sugar (used to make cake)?<p>Also hotdogs are made with Wiener sausages, which are from...
        • craftkiller41 minutes ago
          &gt; Now I wonder who invented [...] sugar (used to make cake)?<p>If you&#x27;re talking about the refined product, then India. If you&#x27;re talking about the plant, then New Guinea and Taiwan.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;History_of_sugar" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;History_of_sugar</a>
        • onionisafruit1 hour ago
          beef or pork if you’re lucky
          • davrosthedalek35 minutes ago
            Das Auge ist (man) mit.
          • Isamu1 hour ago
            I tried tofu dogs for the first time on the grill, they were pretty good.
          • dh20221 hour ago
            In the production of these hotdogs no animals were harmed!
        • dnautics51 minutes ago
          Austria! nothing bad came from Austria
          • hi_hi44 minutes ago
            The people of Frankfurt would like to have a word!
      • echelon1 hour ago
        No more using the English language, either.
        • PaulDavisThe1st1 hour ago
          You mean since it was invented by Indians, Germans and the French?
    • buu7002 hours ago
      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;YPX__g3LpUY?t=9" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;YPX__g3LpUY?t=9</a>
    • stevage2 hours ago
      You literally just explained the value.
    • consensus154 minutes ago
      Fell free to leave it to the professionals then. That has always been your right.
    • greenavocado1 hour ago
      &gt; I just think it&#x27;s time that we left it to the professionals.<p>Pulling up the ladder behind you, eh? So nice of you to think of the children.
    • ActorNightly1 hour ago
      [flagged]
      • a34729t1 hour ago
        I concur, this would be good for developing cheap drone warfare capabilities. I mean, I love loud explosions and the sound of freedom because I&#x27;m not a wuss, but we need to get our drone game on China&#x27;s level.
        • consensus153 minutes ago
          Get the drone show up and open it up to amateurs trying to shoot down the drone show for maximum adversarial drone warfare preparedness!
          • fc417fc80226 minutes ago
            That would unironically be an amazing festival activity. A drone lightshow open to public participation where the different colors are tied to swarms engaged in a battle royale.<p>I also can&#x27;t wait for the return of traditional blood sport events with bipedal robots as the contenders (but I digress).
      • cube001 hour ago
        Drones have their own failure mode <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.abc.net.au&#x2F;news&#x2F;2026-05-27&#x2F;sydney-vivid-festival-drone-failure-explainer&#x2F;106724050" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.abc.net.au&#x2F;news&#x2F;2026-05-27&#x2F;sydney-vivid-festival...</a>
      • JumpCrisscross1 hour ago
        This is almost certain to backfire. Better: make drone shows more available, and maybe subsidise them with a tax on fireworks.
      • jimbooonooo38 minutes ago
        freedom loving Democratic socialist here, this stance is very St Thomas Aquinas of you. let people continue to do the things you did without pulling up the ladder behind you. it&#x27;s just for a night or two, the animals will live.
      • doublerabbit36 minutes ago
        Pollution too.<p>Microbits of plastic, atmospheric smoke, splintered pieces of wood, wildfires.
      • s1artibartfast1 hour ago
        Ban keeping animals and replace them with robots or animal films.<p>Barking dogs cause far more irritation than the nightly fireworks in June and July.<p>Plus, the animals would not have to suffer.
  • comrade12342 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • inigyou1 hour ago
      You&#x27;ve never seen Berlin on New Year&#x27;s Eve then. Residents are recommended to keep all windows tightly closed or a firework may slip inside!
    • cowsandmilk1 hour ago
      How is this relevant? No one shot at the plane.
      • ceejayoz1 hour ago
        &gt; No one shot at the plane.<p>It&#x27;s hardly outside the realm of possibility here.
    • rjsw2 hours ago
      Later wars too [1].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_...</a>