6 comments

  • jdw642 minutes ago
    The reason synthesis expertise is not easily recognized as expertise might be because it&#x27;s hard to evaluate when moving to another system.<p>Analysis expertise is about knowing the limitations of specific languages, libraries, and frameworks, and this is easy to recognize and evaluate. But synthesis expertise, by its nature, is about &#x27;combining systems within a specific company.&#x27; When you change jobs, it&#x27;s hard to apply that combination to a completely different system.<p>For example, even if you know why a company&#x27;s API design and structure were shaped the way they are, that doesn&#x27;t necessarily mean you can use that knowledge directly at your next company. Maybe that&#x27;s why.
  • ajeet25 minutes ago
    I loved reading this article. It was reasonably short to not make the reader lose interest. It jumped around in different domains to make a core point at the end about SREs managing complex systems. This gets even more difficult with the rate of change each of those systems has with coding agents. I don&#x27;t know if I agree with the terms &quot;synthesis&quot; and &quot;analysis&quot; as the equivalent of global and local respectively, but it was a great read.
  • taneq12 minutes ago
    &gt; However, when someone says “calculus” without modification […] there’s no ambiguity about which calculus they are referring to<p>Might be differentiation and integration, might be dental plaque. ;)
  • dreamcompiler38 minutes ago
    &gt; And it turns out that it’s quite straightforward to calculate a derivative, no matter what type of function it is.<p>I get the author&#x27;s point but this is not completely true; there exist functions that are not differentiable at certain places (e.g. ideal square waves) and others that are not differentiable anywhere (e.g. Weierstrass functions).<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Weierstrass_function" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Weierstrass_function</a>
  • dcrazy55 minutes ago
    &gt; (Note: I asked AI for the integral of the Gaussian, I hope it got it right!)<p>It seems like malpractice to not even check this.
    • taneq9 minutes ago
      I don’t think the word applies to a blog post which its self-described as “ramblings”. The formula’s there to look scary and illustrate a point, nobody’s using it to integrate a Gaussian.
  • apsurd55 minutes ago
    Yes, this is documented in Bloom&#x27;s Taxonomy for learning&#x2F;education. Creating is the highest level of understanding.<p><pre><code> Remember – Recall facts, definitions, formulas (memorization). Understand – Explain ideas in your own words. Apply – Use knowledge to solve problems or perform tasks. Analyze – Break information into parts and identify relationships. Evaluate – Judge, critique, or justify decisions. Create – Synthesize ideas to produce something new.</code></pre>