The existence of a license plate indicates that motor vehicle travel is not intended to be untrackable. That makes sense since these are powerful devices. It seems like a fair trade off since a motor vehicle provides many benefits but also high risk.
This has been an ongoing concern (internal surveillance of children and drivers, external of other traffic) for at least two months now:<p>* <i>They're Putting AI Cameras In School Buses</i> (April 7th 2026) - <a href="https://www.usermag.co/p/theyre-putting-ai-cameras-in-school" rel="nofollow">https://www.usermag.co/p/theyre-putting-ai-cameras-in-school</a><p>* School bus Driver Interview: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoAvL1MoTIA" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoAvL1MoTIA</a>
Look up the history of this company, bus patrol - they're felons and in prison.
I guess once someone is a felon, they should never be allowed income? You might be right to criticize the company itself, but is their specific felonious behavior problematic (if so, you haven't spelled that out)? The way you say it, just the fact of them being felons is the problem.
I read a few different articles such as <a href="https://www.thenewspaper.com/news/67/6717.asp" rel="nofollow">https://www.thenewspaper.com/news/67/6717.asp</a> and <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/corrupt-public-official-sentenced-082919" rel="nofollow">https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/corrupt-public-official-sen...</a><p>It seems like it's not BusPatrol, but a company they acquired (Force Multiplier Solutions) that had corrupt leadership. I'm not sure how exactly that went down, or if the same people are still involved, but it does sound pretty bad. Apparently the corruption here caused the Dallas County Schools to go bankrupt and ultimately to be shut down and the school district split into other surrounding districts to take over.
This is the first that I'm hearing about this, but I don't think that your telling is quite right. The Dallas school district is "Dallas ISD", not Dallas County Schools.<p>Dallas County Schools was apparently a school bus service provider that served many different school districts in the area. I don't know why they named it that...<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas_County_Schools" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas_County_Schools</a><p>That situation looks pretty bad, but what happened was that a public school bus services provider went bankrupt, the school districts that it served became responsible for finding private replacement service providers, and residents of the service area had their property taxes raised to pay off the debt.<p>No school districts went bankrupt or were split up, just school bus service providers.
[dead]
Who'd have thought a bus company would run buses for the various applications that buses are used for.
Maybe design cities to be walkable and bikeable so that you have the option get things done without driving a car which is inherently trackable?
That's not the problem. Wave a magic wand and have all cities walkable and bikeable and you'd still have school busses.<p>I suppose we could wave more magic wands and say "ok, everybody with kids has to live in a city whether they like it or not" and wave some more magic wands and eliminate all concerns about crime or other dangers, but if we're going to wave this many magic wands maybe we should just wave one that makes it so children don't need to go to school at all because they are all magically educated already.
The vast majority of folks don't want to walk/bike in Phoenix, Atlanta, Houston, New Orleans, etc where it's near or over 100 degrees in the summer.
But those people don't even have the option, so what do you mean they prefer to not walk/bike? How pleasant walking/biking will be is linked to density, reduced distance to amenities, and infrastructure, things almost no US cities have.<p>I live blocks from Costco in one of those cities but the option is either get on my bike and share the four-lane road with aggressive drivers in massive trucks/SUVs or use a tiny sidewalk that randomly stops and picks up again a block or two later.
Wish granted, now cameras are put up on every walk path and bus stop instead, as people keep getting robbed to/from the stores, so while the school buses aren't fitted with cameras, the streets are instead.
I, for one, do not wish to smell my malodorous coworkers - who have walked or cycled to work and are all sweaty - all day. I already have one of them and it makes me want to vomit.
Man if only there was a solution to this. It's almost as if we could design our environment to minimize this (bike- and pedestrian-friendly routes) and then deal with the aftermath if it happens anyway (showers).<p>I do not consider employers that do not offer showers.
There are ways to gently inform the person(s) of your discomfort. If communicated well, it can be settled. In one case I dealt with, body odour of someone on my team was causing another person distress, but some gentle, kind advice (yes, it was embarrassing as hell so we did it in private) and a quick trip by him to the shops for some deodorant resolved the problem almost instantly. Here's hoping.
There are many ways to avoid this. The problem is your co-worker, not cyclists.
[dead]
While I'm sympathetic to a lot of privacy concerns, how hard is it to simply not be an asshole and not pass school buses when they have their flashing lights out?<p>Also, every car with a dashcam or built in cameras is basically already this. Where I live every intersection has cameras. Most of the buildings. It's not like this is anything new and honestly, probably a better use of cameras than most of the other applications.
> how hard is it to simply not be an asshole and not pass school buses when they have their flashing lights out?<p>As a parent with children who take the bus... this actually doesn't matter. You can't assume that the car's owner is passing the school bus. So, this is a case of finding someone guilty with no physical evidence. And the real fear there is that suddenly you are guilty because someone else was using your Wi-Fi, and you suddenly have the burden of proof to prove your innocence.<p>> Where I live every intersection has cameras.<p>And now you are guilty of crimes. Prove you didn't do them.
The concern is the sharing of such surveillance with law enforcement and other government agencies.
a) it doesn't actually happen that often<p>b) when it does it's usually some stupid situation where robotic adherence to the lights is in poor taste (like a bus picking up or discharging an entire team on a right side curb, or a divided median) albeit legally mandated.<p>c) School bus drivers already radio in plate numbers of anyone who does it in poor taste and the buses mostly already have dashcams so this isn't really solving a problem<p>Source: bus driver in the family
People who pass through red signals need a night or two in jail, not enhanced privacy protections.
Yes, this is concerning. But there's also the other side. Some of the little miscreants who shared my bus ride were positively nasty. Some surveillance would have helped a number of people avoid bullying.
Judging by the enthusiasm for hosted AI models and tools like Claude Code on Hacker News, I don't think people care much about surveillance anymore.