Author here! If you're running a Kubernetes cluster, I recommend you check `kubectl version` and see if you're running "Server Version: v1.36.[0,1,2]". If so, you may want to use the one-liner at the end of the article to check your "process_resident_memory_bytes" on each node, and consider restarting kubelet as a temporary workaround to tame the memory leak until v1.36.3 is released.
Not all heroes wear capes! Well done
Very cool. It's often daunting to contribute to such a well-established and recognizable project, but this is exactly how it should work.
Nice find.<p>Can't help but feel this is one of the subtle traps hidden beneath the advice that contexts aren't supposed to be stored. I know it's not always that easy, of course.
Thanks. I know there's a `go vet` tool that's run as part of Kubernetes CI, and one of its checks is:<p><pre><code> lostcancel: check cancel func returned by context.WithCancel is called
</code></pre>
I'm not 100% sure why `go vet` didn't catch this issue, but storing the context in the struct is probably part of the reason.