8 comments

  • ursuscamp9 minutes ago
    Too late, damage is already done. We have been on the wrong timeline for years at this point.
  • brokencode25 minutes ago
    I feel like the title is a little overdramatic.<p>They’re not saying goodbye to the LHC, they’re upgrading it to have 10x the power.
  • charmd16 hours ago
    I&#x27;ve read that CERN is storing more than 1 exabyte of collisions data these days (up from 600PB during the last long shutdown <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;information-technology.web.cern.ch&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;CERNDataCentre_KeyInformation_Nov2021V1.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;information-technology.web.cern.ch&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;fil...</a>). Not too shaby...
    • DiabloD31 hour ago
      All using ZFS, too
      • dijit1 hour ago
        uhoh, can only store 1000 of that dataset then. D:
        • DiabloD326 minutes ago
          In one pool, sure.<p>You can have more than one pool.
  • drybjed8 minutes ago
    El Psy Kongroo.
  • kristopolous42 minutes ago
    The typo that sometimes got through in official literature still makes me giggle<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=site%3Acern.ch+%22large+hardon+collider%22" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=site%3Acern.ch+%22large+hard...</a>
    • modeless7 minutes ago
      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20170814124609&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;largehardoncollider.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20170814124609&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;largehardo...</a>
  • archimedes2371 hour ago
    Hopefully no sophons appear.
    • kridsdale129 minutes ago
      You don’t want an ocular alarm clock?
  • pjmlp14 hours ago
    Having done my little contribution to ATLAS TDAQ&#x2F;HLT in the early 2000&#x27;s, it is an interesting feeling to see the next steps taking shape.
  • nok22kon56 minutes ago
    bad timing with the price of RAM and NAND