If you waited until today to get terrified... Then I guess you're one of today's unlucky 10,000. Congratulations, or something.
What makes a car ‘made in China’ (therefore over 100% tariffs) vs ‘assembled in the USA’ (therefore no tariffs)?<p>The battery, engine and everything else is absolutely Chinese made. I don’t know how much assembly there is honestly but i feel the Geely, err i mean Polestar was a little close to that line.<p>I will say the laws around this indicate just how ridiculous tariffs can be. There’s always some line to press up against and honestly if electric motors, batteries, car bodies and wheels from china have different tariffs to a car as a whole it’s always going to lead to china shipping those parts in an easy to bolt together way to ‘make a car’.
Read up on the "chicken tax" for how long the auto industry has navigated weird assemvly games: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_tax" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_tax</a>
Reminds me of this.<p>There's a whole industry around reverse engineering tariff classifications to find ways to minimize all-in manufacturing cost.<p>For example, let's say you sell air purifiers.<p>Option 1 is to import an air purifier and pay the 25% tariff (or whatever the actual duty rate is) on air purifiers.<p>Option 2 is to import a widget that gets classified as a fan (with 5% duty) and import a widget that gets classified as an air filter (with 10% duty), then put them in the same box somewhere in the US.<p>Both are sold to consumers as an air purifier. But one of the options minimizes total cost to the manufacturer.
To add to this, sneakers with a barely visible fuzzy fabric bottom are one of the best examples of tariff engineering: <a href="https://www.gazetc.com/blog/2010/08/sneaking-through-us-customs-with-converse-allstar-invention.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.gazetc.com/blog/2010/08/sneaking-through-us-cust...</a>
Might it be that one sells EV’s and the other sells ICE cars? Or perhaps stupidity re Volvo’s ownership? Or a missing bribe?
Related:<p><i>Feds deny Polestar authorization to sell cars in US from model year 2027</i><p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678494">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678494</a>
the main point to me here is that such decisions should be fully public including all the input info and all the reasoning that is behind the decision, similar to a court case. Instead we have that guessing game.
Probably the stupid politician behind it didn't get the memo that Volvo is no longer a swedish company?
The feds also controlling who has access to AI models. <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692995">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692995</a><p>It's all just this lawless personal fealty shit.
It would be better if the AI censorship was lawless, rather than authorized by the Arms Export Control Act of 1976, since that would allow the Article III branch of the federal government to be a defense against it. The lawfulness makes it worse.
It does not terrify me.
It’s because the Polestar cars have a lot more electronic surveillance than the Volvo models, which have had only minor tweaks and have mostly not been updated for years.
If it were just about electronic surveillance, a bunch of other cars/manufacturers would be getting impeded or at least get some sort of negative scrutiny.<p><a href="https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/categories/cars/" rel="nofollow">https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/cate...</a>
Correction: it is because a major Republican donor wants Chinese cars banned, because they beat the living shit out of his offerings on quality and value.<p>It is silly to credulously pretend that the excuse about Chinese software has even a whiff of legitimacy.
><i>Polestar is done in the U.S. market. Its sister brand Volvo, owned by the same Chinese parent company, was spared. No one has explained why. The U.S. Federal Government is meddling with the automotive industry, the free market, and capitalism.</i><p>I'm not saying "trust the government", not at all. But meddling in China trade is absolutely not meddling with the free market.
Why would we let China pump and dump our economy with cheap goods? We already tried that and it didn’t work.
Our cheap exports: competitive, free markets maximizing efficiency and delivering value to consumers<p>Their cheap exports: sinister pump and dump
I think a national security argument is much more sound than an economic one, although costs are externalized in a way that isn't obvious, i.e. ecological disaster that shipping everything around the world and back (components, assemblies) is, and hollowing out a local supply chain takes virtually no time while the impact or limits of it are hidden until abrupt breakage (i.e. covid-era shortages on basic supplies, wars, or heavy handed statesmen dictating preferential access to silicon or whatever today). That is, every nation has to maintain some stake in not hollowing out completely while still participating in global commerce.<p>Once upon a time nations understood the issues better: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_telephone_switches" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_telephone_switches</a>
They have capital controls. Good luck moving yuan instead of Labubus.
The alternative to Chinese goods is not locally made goods for the majority of people. It's either Chinese goods that we pretend are locally made, or it's nothing because they can't afford the local stuff.<p>Cheap good for decades has meant companies have been able to depress wages to the point no one can really live without them. Removing the cheap goods without also giving up massive corporate profits would just mean most people collapse into poverty.
Nobody wants to do the hard work of developing industry, reducing cost of living and doing business so workers are more competitive, and changing all the rules that make China 10x more attractive for this sort of thing.<p>They just want to ban even more things.
Might want to google “pump and dump”. Serious non-sequitur here.
You're going to be able to compare this new way with the old way.
Careful what you wish for.
We can’t even make expensive versions of those goods