TFA has 2 Qs aimed at building trust-culture:<p>><i>Who has the missing context?</i><p>><i>If the work succeeds, what changes beyond “the project shipped”?</i><p>As a total rando trying to develop a (possible) nothing-burger I call <i>expert embarrassment</i>, I'd derive 2+2 corresponding <i>what-if</i>s:<p>What if<p><pre><code> 1. nobody in the org does?
2. the project ships yet nothing changes?
</code></pre>
Excuse my extra <i>what-if</i>s for being kind of sly takes on the class of "Maserati Problems"<p><a href="https://dfccyyqjngn5p3.archive.ph/uWeuT/2f4f3d465f8a85a41e897530d17a6beff4683679.jpg" rel="nofollow">https://dfccyyqjngn5p3.archive.ph/uWeuT/2f4f3d465f8a85a41e89...</a><p><pre><code> 3. What if we don't market our solution?
4. but it still blows up in our face?
</code></pre>
(MPs being defined by the context that makes their technicality _seem_ reasonable only long after you'd have acquired one, but your ability to answer them matters _now_<p>Here's a real world instance, related much better than I ever could<p><a href="https://www.cringely.com/2026/05/28/the-permission-slip/" rel="nofollow">https://www.cringely.com/2026/05/28/the-permission-slip/</a><p>)