4 comments

  • cptroot3 hours ago
    I know this is a small point, but you likely mean &quot;race condition&quot; here. Rust already guarantees safe code to be free of &quot;data races&quot;, and this blog post doesn&#x27;t discuss unsafe in any way.<p>Two other points that came up while I was reading:<p>1. I get that this is something you did once for an internal project, but this is what macros and derive_macros are made for.<p>2. The AI that you used to help write the post left its mark a little too deep. The cliched phrases make an appearance at the start of every section and it really starts to grate by the end.
    • infinitebit3 hours ago
      “The second condition falls out of the first”. Hi claude!
  • asdf889904 hours ago
    AI written article. I hate how I can quickly pick this up these days and I hate how I see it everywhere recently.<p>If you don’t have time to write, I don’t have time to read it.
    • TonyAlicea103 hours ago
      I stopped reading at &quot;Here’s the observation that started everything:&quot;.
  • ydj44 minutes ago
    Surely you can express this in C++ just as you could in rust…
  • nynx4 hours ago
    I don’t think this needed to be parallelized.