13 comments

  • Hackbraten2 hours ago
    Cloudflare: let&#x27;s give the bots their own accounts so they can scrape harder.<p>Also Cloudflare: let&#x27;s send normal humans who are trying to go about their daily lives into endless Turnstile spinner loops with absolutely zero recourse, grievance, or support infrastructure.
    • moritzruth1 hour ago
      First you spread the disease, then you sell the cure.
      • deadbabe20 minutes ago
        I think this is more of a “keep friends close but enemies closer” type thing.
        • throw12345678913 minutes ago
          Sounds more like “let’s make money twice”.
    • jwr2 hours ago
      I had similar thoughts: &quot;let&#x27;s convince everyone to outsource the decision on who can access their websites to us, because BOTS BOTS BOTS&quot; and &quot;let&#x27;s make life easier for bots to do things&quot;.
    • j4530 minutes ago
      It&#x27;s a clean way to charge AI to read content too.
    • isodev1 hour ago
      But think of the shareholders
      • deadbabe1 hour ago
        Anyone can be a shareholder.
        • horacemorace52 minutes ago
          Said the rich swe, fully oblivious of many who struggle to feed their own children.
          • copperx28 minutes ago
            I thought there were no rich swes anymore?
          • deadbabe23 minutes ago
            Cloudflare is in the S&amp;P500. If you have a 401k diversified in broad market indexes then most likely… you are a shareholder.
          • skinfaxi36 minutes ago
            That&#x27;s unnecessarily presumptuous.
  • simonw1 hour ago
    Hot damn...<p>&gt; Any agent can now run wrangler deploy --temporary and deploy a Worker to Cloudflare. This temporary deployment stays live for 60 minutes, during which time you can claim the temporary account, making it permanently your own. If you don&#x27;t, it expires on its own.<p>Forget about agents, Cloudflare just provided free scratch deployments - ephemeral for 60 minutes - for <i>anyone</i>.<p>This is going to be amazing for things like PR previews and code review. Being able to deploy a preview to a <i>working URL</i> for free is a huge reduction in friction.<p>I hope it doesn&#x27;t get abused so much that they turn it off again.
    • simonw1 hour ago
      I just tried this out:<p><pre><code> % npx wrangler deploy --temporary wrangler 4.103.0 ──────────────────── You must accept Cloudflare&#x27;s Terms of Service (https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cloudflare.com&#x2F;terms&#x2F;) and Privacy Policy (https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cloudflare.com&#x2F;privacypolicy&#x2F;) in order to continue. By typing &quot;yes&quot;, you agree to these terms. Type &quot;yes&quot; to continue. … yes Solving proof-of-work challenge… Temporary account ready: Account: Educated Celery (created) Claim within: 60 minutes Claim URL: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dash.cloudflare.com&#x2F;claim-preview?claimToken=CAVe7LzWiGad-redacted Total Upload: 13.79 KiB &#x2F; gzip: 4.12 KiB Uploaded cloudflare-redirect-resolver (2.27 sec) Deployed cloudflare-redirect-resolver triggers (0.50 sec) https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloudflare-redirect-resolver.educated-celery.workers.dev Current Version ID: 5c12da7f-2749-4ccc-a8f6-79b85da98d10 </code></pre> I&#x27;m amused that it made me accept the terms and conditions without any indication of who I am, but it did work - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloudflare-redirect-resolver.educated-celery.workers.dev" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloudflare-redirect-resolver.educated-celery.workers...</a> will be live for the next 59 minutes.
      • bstsb49 minutes ago
        &gt; I&#x27;m amused that it made me accept the terms and conditions without any indication of who I am<p>as far as i’m aware, that’s fully binding and often an accepted practise - take Minecraft’s server software, where you must accept the EULA with a text flag before running
      • avipars54 minutes ago
        You might want to claim the link or remove it
        • simonw18 minutes ago
          I redacted it, but if anyone still has at and wants to steal my demo app they&#x27;re welcome to it.
        • xyzzy_plugh47 minutes ago
          Why?
    • aleksiy12341 minutes ago
      Wasn’t this case pretty much before?<p>The limits are 100 workers on free and 500 on paid.<p>And if need more then you can always go their platform which supports tenancy.<p>As long as you have a cronjob or similar to clean up the cost of having per PR preview is pretty much zero.
    • aplomb102642 minutes ago
      [flagged]
  • piterrro12 minutes ago
    Lets keep in mind this is cloudflare workers runtime - it only makes sense to deploy small things there, maybe static sites. Unless the agent creates something for cf workers from scratch, asking it to „now deploy to cloudflare” will fail so bad.<p>This would only work if they would provision docker image deployment, similar to google cloud run, but the still, everything serveless has its own caveats…
  • jsyang001 hour ago
    &gt; Make snail-game in Cloudflare Worker in TypeScript and deploy it using wrangler, don&#x27;t ask me questions, do the best you can<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;snail-game.solstice-barometer.workers.dev&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;snail-game.solstice-barometer.workers.dev&#x2F;</a><p>pretty cool.
  • anilgulecha2 hours ago
    If eastdakota&#x2F;jgc are here.<p>- simply expose containers to the world directly - without having to go via workers.<p>- You have other amazing parts of the stack anyway (D1, durable objects, a great object store). These aren&#x27;t considered &quot;lockin&quot;.<p>- workers is &quot;lockin&quot; - not similar enough to lambda&#x2F;cloud functions and so becomes CF specific.<p>Not having a simple container based compute piece has made me hesitate in taking up CF. (Fly or firebase won out)
    • jgrahamc1 hour ago
      I am here but I retired from being CTO of Cloudflare in March 2025 [1] and the current CTO is Dane Knecht (dknecht here). What advantage does decoupling Cloudflare Containers from Cloudflare Workers have?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.cloudflare.com&#x2F;three-chapters-at-cloudflare-programmer-to-cto-to-board-of-directors&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.cloudflare.com&#x2F;three-chapters-at-cloudflare-pro...</a>
      • htrp58 minutes ago
        quick piece of feedback, the workers architecture is a little bit annoying when converting from Lambda but hooking up to cloudflare MCP solves 90% of the issues
        • tailscaler202621 minutes ago
          there&#x27;s absolutely nothing positive we want to encourage copying from AWS&#x27;s architectural approach to anything.
    • yodon2 hours ago
      &gt;Not having a simple container based compute piece made me hesitate in taking up CF<p>Agreed. I wish CF had something like Azure&#x27;s new fast-starting Express containers.
    • ndjdjxixjenej2 hours ago
      [dead]
  • derektank2 hours ago
    Would love to know more about how Cloudflare plans to prevent abuse of ephemeral infrastructure to host malicious content. From elsewhere in their documentation, “Cloudflare limits how quickly you can create temporary preview accounts. If the Wrangler CLI cannot create an account because too many temporary preview accounts were requested too quickly, wait before retrying or authenticate the CLI with a permanent Cloudflare account,” and “Cloudflare applies additional abuse prevention checks to temporary preview accounts.”[1] This is a bit vague though. Creating a new account has never been a huge hurdle to overcome but this seems to reduce the barrier to entry even more.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.cloudflare.com&#x2F;workers&#x2F;platform&#x2F;claim-deployments&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.cloudflare.com&#x2F;workers&#x2F;platform&#x2F;claim-dep...</a>
    • rdtsc2 hours ago
      &gt; Would love to know more about how Cloudflare plans to prevent abuse of ephemeral infrastructure to host malicious content<p>If it helps laugh DDoS attacks they would be incentivized to do the exact opposite. They can charge more for “protection” then.
  • aniviacat2 hours ago
    Wouldn&#x27;t it make more sense to merge the temporary account into an existing one, instead of claiming it as a new account?<p>This could lead to people having a large amount of separate accounts.
    • kylecazar2 hours ago
      I assumed that&#x27;s how it works if you sign in before claiming the account?<p>It says to claim you can either sign up or sign in.
  • 827a2 hours ago
    Correct me if I&#x27;m wrong, but does Cloudflare still not have a &quot;Create Account&quot; button on the account listing page? I think you still have to sign up from scratch doing plus-code email tricks, then invite your original email address as an admin, juggling multiple accounts. They should consider fixing that first.
    • frogperson51 minutes ago
      Cloudflare makes it really hard to spend money. I constantly have to talk to someone in sales to enable some feature after rounds of negotiating on price. I think they would have way more customers, spending much more money, if they just offered transparent pricing, and fully on-demand services.
    • quinncom1 hour ago
      If I want to onboard a client to Cloudflare, I have to ask them to create an account and then invite me, which is a lot of friction for non-technical people.<p>A “create account” button accessible to me would be so much better. Then, I create the account and invite the client to join as owner.
  • conception2 hours ago
    I know no one is writing copy anymore but i wish they tried to edit it a bit so it wasn’t so glaringly obvious. It just sours the product when it seems like so little effort was put into the message. And it’s not even hard - just change the prompt used!
  • variety86752 hours ago
    posted yesterday as well: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=48598906">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=48598906</a>
  • soared2 hours ago
    I’m going to need a wrapper for all these services offering this service.
  • truvem2 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • chinallm_ai2 hours ago
    [dead]