3 comments

  • malchow1 hour ago
    Well-run autolabs recursively training discipline-specific models are becoming very valuable assets. I write more about this here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;jmalchow&#x2F;status&#x2F;2067298271647904061" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;jmalchow&#x2F;status&#x2F;2067298271647904061</a>
    • wasabi9910111 hour ago
      Is there a way to read this without a Twitter account?
      • WithinReason11 minutes ago
        <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xcancel.com&#x2F;OpenAI&#x2F;status&#x2F;2067293746556027376" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xcancel.com&#x2F;OpenAI&#x2F;status&#x2F;2067293746556027376</a><p><i>GPT-5.4 reviewed scientific literature, generated and ranked research proposals, helped design experiments, analyzed results, and proposed follow-up studies.<p>Human chemists steered the work, selected proposals for testing, and validated the final result.<p>Maria [AI] tested the idea across 10,080 reactions, and human chemists later validated representative results by hand.<p>Under the optimized conditions, yields improved for 88% of the boronic acids and 83% of the sulfonamides tested.<p>Human chemists then repeated 14 representative reactions by hand: 11 showed higher yields, including 8 with a more than twofold improvement.<p>The full process took about 2.5 months, plus another half month for human chemists to write up the results.</i>
      • malchow11 minutes ago
        <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.linkedin.com&#x2F;pulse&#x2F;bicycle-joseph-malchow-liv9c&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.linkedin.com&#x2F;pulse&#x2F;bicycle-joseph-malchow-liv9c&#x2F;</a>
      • FigurativeVoid38 minutes ago
        It looks like xcancel doesn&#x27;t support articles yet. There may be another service?
  • gnabgib24 minutes ago
    No such thing as an AI chemist (a chemist being someone who has a degree in chemistry or related), oh that&#x27;s not even the title. <i>Near-autonomous AI chemist improves challenging reaction in medicinal chemistry</i>
    • cml12319 minutes ago
      I also had a strong reaction to the title from their research blog; too anthropomorphic. Model, agent, or system don&#x27;t have the same personification.
    • readthenotes118 minutes ago
      I noticed the Wikipedia article so that it was a &quot;graduated scientist&quot; (outside of UK).<p>It made me wonder what other professions require an associate&#x27;s degree or better to be able to claim the profession without some sort of modifier, such as licensed physician, or Master plumber...
    • Xmd5a20 minutes ago
      are you a chemist?
      • IAmBroom7 minutes ago
        That has no bearing. I am not a Medical Doctor, but I know that AI cannot be an MD.
  • refurb15 minutes ago
    As a former chemist, what&#x27;s old is new again!<p>It&#x27;s basically high through put screening plus an AI engine to map out the &quot;variable space&quot;.<p>Back in 1990 when robotics became more reliable we did the same thing. The only difference is a trained chemist would determine what variables would be altered.<p>It&#x27;s not that hard to do, it doesn&#x27;t take that much brain power, just an understanding of what variables may impact the yield. Claiming AI can now do this isn&#x27;t all that impressive.