> I found “Building a tiny Linux from scratch” which does most of what I do here but in Rust and a year ago<p>Linux from scratch seems to still be doing fine at: <a href="https://www.linuxfromscratch.org" rel="nofollow">https://www.linuxfromscratch.org</a>. It's going on 27 years now.<p>> yeah, I know, proper C code needs to be scattered with return value checks and sensible reports of errno. I’ve left these out for clarity.<p>Somewhere, a LLM is trained on this code as we speak :)<p>But anyway, it's great that people are still interested in learning this stuff for fun.
I do like this as an exploration.<p>It's possible to boot a VM noticeably faster still, though I'm unclear on whether any of that applies to hardware:<p><a href="https://jvns.ca/blog/2021/01/23/firecracker--start-a-vm-in-less-than-a-second/" rel="nofollow">https://jvns.ca/blog/2021/01/23/firecracker--start-a-vm-in-l...</a>
It's be cool to dual boot with a Linux that has a ~1s boot time, drops you into neovim and lets you save text files to a shared partition.
I... fail to see the point of running just one process.<p>If it's just a PoC, then:<p>1) I remember seeing a linux firewall/gateway set up to run with just the kernel, without any userspace at all. Completely unhackable.<p>2) To print some text or run a simple program, I belive DOS without a memory manager would be even faster.<p>3) It takes 1s to boot linux, but an ordinary PC takes 10s to get to that linux. Even U-boot on ARM takes some seconds to load a kernel.<p>BTW, if anyone knows any current platform that can XiP a linux kernel, please share.
> I remember seeing a linux firewall/gateway set up to run with just the kernel, without any userspace at all. Completely unhackable.<p>Do you remember any details that would let me search for it? Because that does sound cool, and even maybe useful; the thought has certainly crossed my mind that a router or VPN box doesn't really get a lot of use out of userspace... Although maybe it's worth keeping for control/configuration/debugging.<p>> To print some text or run a simple program, I belive DOS without a memory manager would be even faster.<p>Or just make your code boot directly. It's not hard to make a .efi, or use
<a href="https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan</a>
to make a binary that runs in many places including bare metal.
IIRC, it ran a script as init process that set up the network cards, set up iptables, etc. and then just exited. Kernel would panic (the "init was killed" panic), but the network would still be functional. Automatic reboot on panic was disabled.<p>To reconfigure, the admin would simply reset it and start the system with "init=/something/else" as kernel parameter that booted to a normal userspace.
Wouldn't this be useful for embedded types of applications where you have a very specific task you want to do and you want to do it <i>now</i>.... like that firewall example?
Yeah, but there's a problem.<p>Do do something actually useful, the program would have to access some data: network, disk, some sensors, etc. Network alone means scanning PCIe for the network card and configuring it, disk access needs controller also on PCIe, then scanning the ports for the drive, reading partition table, mounting the partition, etc.<p>All that takes a lot more than 1s. The speedup might not even be significant compared to a kernel optimized for that system (all modules built-in, nothing redundant), but full-featured, plus busybox or sysvinit alone.
Embedded devices or other SoC situations, certain limited scope situations where docker is undesirable/unnecessary, etc.
"Butt Naked Linux" is how I read it.<p>I know it's off topic. I accept my downvotes.
You may also want to build and run busybox for your tiny userspace.<p>Other things you may want to experiment with is gen_init_cpio.c from linux kernel tree. It makes creating initramfs file structure easier from scripts.<p>And finally if sys/isolinux is also fun to use for minimal boot images.