4 comments

  • mijoharas27 minutes ago
    This article links to a previous one[0] (by Poul) which states:<p>&gt; I will also state for the record, that there are no hard feelings between Varnish Software and the FOSS project.<p>I wonder if that is still the case now. (this article is fairly diplomatically written, but I&#x27;d imagine it must be pretty frustrating)<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vinyl-cache.org&#x2F;organization&#x2F;20-years.html#years" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vinyl-cache.org&#x2F;organization&#x2F;20-years.html#years</a>
  • ksimukka9 minutes ago
    &quot;Vinyl cache&quot; is an interesting name. I wonder what other candidates the maintainers considered? I was secretly hoping they would name it &quot;Veneer Cache&quot; or something similar to &quot;varnish&quot;.
  • stephenr1 hour ago
    The comparison with MySQL&#x2F;MariaDB is unfortunate, given that since the &quot;split&quot; MariaDB has shown itself to be every bit the corporate owned &quot;FOSS&quot; project while its supporters still harp on about how terrible oracle is for OSS, without actually acknowledging the real history of each respective project and accompanying company.<p>Given that MariaDB the company is now owned by a private equity firm, I doubt it&#x27;s going to get better.
    • Intermernet28 minutes ago
      Still got Percona, but I&#x27;m not sure what their status is at the moment.
  • haeseong29 minutes ago
    [flagged]