8 comments

  • gritspants1 hour ago
    Seems this has more to do with Palestine and Google's involvement with Israel to provide cloud computing.
    • smallerize1 hour ago
      If only there weren't so many reasons.
    • ergocoder1 hour ago
      [flagged]
      • shigawire56 minutes ago
        Stanford students are criticizing Google for enabling Israel. If Google was providing support for Hamas they could protest that too.
        • ergocoder48 minutes ago
          I&#x27;ve never seen any protest by students that protested against Palestine.<p>In fact, at University of Washington, a protest was organized to support Palestine after the Oct 7 massacre on Oct 8; they chose to show support Palestine after Palestine did a massacre. And there was a very little criticism on that kind of actions.
          • bdangubic43 minutes ago
            &gt; I&#x27;ve never seen any protest by students that protested against Palestine.<p>you should think long and hard why that is but answer is as always quite simple
            • ergocoder42 minutes ago
              We all know why, and the reason doesn&#x27;t fit what you want to believe. That&#x27;s why you pretend to be obscure about it. Otherwise, you would have just said so out loud already.
              • neaden16 minutes ago
                It&#x27;s because the US government doesn&#x27;t fund hamas and US companies don&#x27;t work with Hamas.
                • ergocoder5 minutes ago
                  The protest isn&#x27;t about Hamas&#x2F;Palestine. It&#x27;s about criticizing what Israel is doing.
                  • neaden0 minutes ago
                    I was answering why you don&#x27;t see people protesting Hamas, which is what you brought up. If you didn&#x27;t want to discuss that, then you shouldn&#x27;t have brought it up.
        • xenospn15 minutes ago
          They could. But they would never.
        • x3n0ph3n348 minutes ago
          We both know they wouldn&#x27;t, though.
      • bodegajed43 minutes ago
        I think Stanford students are not out of touch. Google has enough revenue to sustain itself but yet they decided to become an arms dealer. CEOs only care about the shareholder.
      • conception58 minutes ago
        Both governments may be but there isn’t a power balance between the two in any appreciable way nor in a civilian casualty balance, especially concerning children casualties.
        • spwa419 minutes ago
          I think you mean one of the two governments works tirelessly to minimize casualties, especially children.<p>The other of the two governments works tirelessly to <i>maximize</i> casualties, especially children.<p>Both sides, of course, occasionally fuck it up too.
      • cyanydeez44 minutes ago
        yes, the kid trying to fight back is equal to the adult punching down.<p>This is the time of moral fortitude of a 12 year old.
      • za3faran29 minutes ago
        Let&#x27;s not victim blame here. Would you have called the Indians evil for wanting to have liberty from the british occupiers? What about the many other european colonies in Asia and Africa, were the locals &quot;evil&quot; for wanting to resist and get liberty?
        • cyberax16 minutes ago
          If they did that by slaughtering civilians? Yes. Absolutely.
      • nujabe59 minutes ago
        lol you clearly think the Palestine side are worse, stop being disingenuous and say it with your chest.<p>Only one side is being armed and funded by our tax dollars, and that’s good enough reason to protest.
        • fhn45 minutes ago
          your current employer funds the Israelis
          • DaSHacka28 minutes ago
            ...hence the protesting?
        • filoleg48 minutes ago
          &gt; Only one side is being armed and funded by our tax dollars<p>I mean, yeah, I would heavily prefer for one of the sides in this conflict to be much better funded and armed than the other. Specifically, the side that I consider to be fundamentally in the right in the conflict.<p>Whichever side I am talking about is not relevant to the point. What&#x27;s relevant to the actual point I am trying to make, is that I don&#x27;t think that one side being better armed and funded serves as a reasonable indicator of which side is right&#x2F;wrong in a given conflict.
        • ergocoder53 minutes ago
          &gt; you clearly think the Palestine side are worse<p>You only think that in order to fit your narrative... even I already stated the contrary.<p>&gt; that’s good enough reason to protest.<p>Clearly, this protest isn&#x27;t about that. The protest is about criticizing Israel&#x27;s actions.<p>It&#x27;s you who should stop being disingenuous
        • spwa423 minutes ago
          [flagged]
      • HeavyStorm48 minutes ago
        [flagged]
        • fhn45 minutes ago
          You sound more out of touch...
          • ergocoder41 minutes ago
            You sound more out of touch...
  • sva_59 minutes ago
    I wonder what percentage of total graduates walked out? The video shows maybe around 50 people at all. The title makes it seem like everyone graduating walked out.
  • Venn11 hour ago
    Tech leaders from this era will not be remembered well.
    • dragonelite4 minutes ago
      There&#x27;s not much good to remember them by for the past decade they have been implementing a global panopticon system etc.<p>At least in the 1990s and 2000s it felt they were doing some good stuff for humanity. But the 2010s and 2020s the masked pretty much slipped.
    • LeFantome2 minutes ago
      That is a bold prediction
  • stevenwoo53 minutes ago
    I went to the Electrical Engineering ceremony, the only speakers were from the faculty and one newly minted B.S.E.E. I biked there and saw there were a lot of smaller ceremonies across the campus outside of the stadium the photo captures.
  • arjie42 minutes ago
    Speech itself was kind of fun: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.google&#x2F;company-news&#x2F;inside-google&#x2F;message-ceo&#x2F;stanford-commencement-speech-2026&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.google&#x2F;company-news&#x2F;inside-google&#x2F;message-ceo&#x2F;s...</a><p>Pretty light hearted, and honestly considering that he&#x27;s given a speech to an empty stadium before (as referenced in the first few sentences, I think he&#x27;ll have handled it just fine.<p>&gt; But people have also been giving me a lot of advice on what to say. Actually, it’s been the same advice, and it’s about what not to say. People thought it would be really difficult for me; it is the last two letters of my last name, after all.<p>Ha, chuckle-worthy. Of course he&#x27;d find it hard to not pitch AI.<p>The only thing I find surprising is no-one points out that Stanford is a truly elite education system: Some 2 in 5 of students enter disabled, but almost all of them end up successful over time.
  • wxw1 hour ago
    What was the speech on?
    • hoppyhoppy21 hour ago
      It was a commencement speech. Here&#x27;s a transcript: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.google&#x2F;company-news&#x2F;inside-google&#x2F;message-ceo&#x2F;stanford-commencement-speech-2026&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.google&#x2F;company-news&#x2F;inside-google&#x2F;message-ceo&#x2F;s...</a>
    • downrightmike1 hour ago
      [flagged]
      • throw12345678911 hour ago
        If you&#x27;d click on the link and listen to the 17 second video (don&#x27;t even have to watch it!), you&#x27;d know how wrong you are.
        • pkaye1 hour ago
          What is it about? The audio is too noisy (my hearing is bad...)
        • dh202254 minutes ago
          Thanks for the link. Sundar couldn’t be more tone deaf. Pretending this is not a time of great anxiety shows how much stock you can put in his words.
  • smashah1 hour ago
    Good kids - proud of them.