8 comments

  • yjftsjthsd-h7 hours ago
    Notable for still maintaining some level of SPARC support.<p>On a personal level I&#x27;m impressed and fascinated by the fact that apparently one man created and has maintained an illumos distro for many years;<p>* making an OS distro at all is hard<p>* making an illumos distro is harder (less precedent to work from, and IMHO Sun didn&#x27;t do a great job documenting things if you weren&#x27;t inside Sun)<p>* making a <i>different</i> distro is harder; this isn&#x27;t an OpenIndiana rehash, AFAIK it&#x27;s mostly novel<p>* and of course maintaining it for so long is a huge undertaking
    • ptribble5 hours ago
      One of the reasons for creating Tribblix in the first place was that there really wasn&#x27;t any documentation on how OpenSolaris (as was) was built. I wanted to understand that, so had to work it out essentially from scratch. I soon worked out that there were ways to do it better, and Tribblix is still here something like 15 years later.
  • Altern4tiveAcc4 hours ago
    Has anyone managed to boot it on bare metal using an AM5 motherboard?<p>I tried booting various Illumos distros through USB sticks on two different AM5 computers, and it got stuck very early on. I assume due to some incompatibility with USB 3.0. Meanwhile, a friend of mine booted on a Thinkpad just fine from a DVD.
  • ruslan1 hour ago
    Cannot find what are the min HW requirements ? What min RAM&#x2F;HDD&#x2F;CPU to get simple X11 environment ? Will it run on 486DX2-66 ?
    • Narishma1 hour ago
      It says 32-bit support completely removed, so I doubt it.
  • prmoustache3 hours ago
    What does &quot;retro&quot; mean in this case. I failed to find what was really different compares to other illumos based OS.
    • ptribble3 hours ago
      It&#x27;s a bit of an in-joke, as if illumos itself isn&#x27;t retro enough. But it relates to the use of older (smaller, faster, lighter weight, more reliable and well tested) technologies in certain places, the most obvious being the use of traditional SVR4 packaging as opposed to IPS.
  • solarengineer8 hours ago
    Very good work by Peter Tribble
  • Guestmodinfo7 hours ago
    It is comparable to slackware as I says on the website and for many yas i have wanted to use slackware. So i want to install it on my pentium laptop that I got in 2020. I want to run zoom on it with screen sharing. Can I do that? I can use antix linux on that laptop frthe same purpose.
    • yjftsjthsd-h7 hours ago
      You can <i>try</i> running it via LX zone (Linux compatibility) but I would consider it a <i>very</i> far stretch. You might be able to make it work via browser but I don&#x27;t know the situation there.
    • Altern4tiveAcc4 hours ago
      Should work fine if you can run Zoom through Firefox.
    • solarengineer7 hours ago
      You can try via a usb bootable and see if the hardware is recognised
      • 2b3a516 hours ago
        Would that be a question of using dd to write the iso to a USB stick, or are we talking about burning the iso to a DVD, booting and installing to a USB drive?<p>PS: Thanks to Peter Tribble for providing this system.<p>Edit: I&#x27;ve just downloaded the basic (Tribblix 0m40) iso, dd&#x27;ed [see below] it to a smallish USB stick and booted an old Thinkpad. Boot succeeded and I was able to log in to the minimal live session. Haven&#x27;t done more than that yet.<p><pre><code> # dd if=tribblix-0m40.iso of=&#x2F;dev&#x2F;sdb bs=1M</code></pre>
        • 2b3a513 hours ago
          Edit timeout reached so replying to my own post.<p>Installed on the Thinkpad T60 using the &#x27;kitchen-sink&#x27; option to the install script following the instructions on the tribblix Web site. Left the USB stick in and rebooted and it did some first run stuff (you have to leave the usb stick plugged in at this stage).<p>Edit: To use a wired connection (e1000 driver on Tribblix) you need to <i>have the network cable plugged in when you boot the usb stick</i>. If you don&#x27;t, then networking does not get configured.<p>The xfce desktop installation is quite nice, with emacs, vim and helix editors and Abiword&#x2F;Gnumeric. Palemoon and Netsurf are available as graphical Web browsers.<p>Sometimes it is good to try something that works on a different basis to what you are used to - the contrast illuminates (lol) what you usually use.
    • unixhero7 hours ago
      No
  • hulitu4 hours ago
    &gt; desktop - an Xfce-based desktop with common tools<p>I would have expected OpenLook. Xfce is ugly.
    • ruslan1 hour ago
      I would expect CDE (or NsCDE).
    • ptribble4 hours ago
      Oh, Open Look is there too. Although I always found Open Look, like SunView before it, to be pretty unpleasant to use.
    • LargoLasskhyfv1 hour ago
      What&#x27;s so ugly about it? The window decorations? The gtk-theme(which can be changed easily anyway), the file-manager, the panel(s)?
  • shevy-java5 hours ago
    Finally TempleOS has a companion - like a brother.<p>Retro will never die.