10 comments

  • usrnm1 minute ago
    Interesting and sad to see the ratio of women to men doing hard work in these photos, even road repairs are done by women. It's mind boggling how devastating the war was for the country.
  • Jgoauh10 minutes ago
    &quot;It becomes evident that the parade was a carefully choreographed spectacle, designed to showcase the Soviet Union’s ideology and power to the world.&quot;<p>Ah yes, everyone known that in a TRUE democracy parades are spontaneously occurring events, self organizing to show the country&#x27;s weaknesses and the population&#x27;s biases.<p>Seriously tho, what does this mean, has anyone ever been to a parade and concluded it was neither coreographed, planned, or meant give a positive image ?<p>How do you determine people&#x27;s enthusiasm is planned and orchestrated by looking at them ?<p>Are all parades proof the country is actually the torture Truman show or just the countries you&#x27;re being payed to spy on ?
  • serious_angel51 minutes ago
    <p><pre><code> Dear Douglas Smith... and the website authors... Thank you, heartfelt... for such an incredible work... for the effort, and you being a miracle... To keep it in the infinite History of us... the Human... Ineffably magnificent... no words may express it... May you have even more success. stability, and peace... Best, and kind regards...</code></pre>
  • adolph9 minutes ago
    <p><pre><code> It unveils the stark contrast between the carefully constructed façade presented by the Soviet authorities and the harsh realities experienced by ordinary citizens. </code></pre> I guess without examples of the &quot;carefully constructed façade&quot; its difficult to understand if there is a contrast. To me, the photos just look like ordinary 1950s street scenes. Waiting at Walgreens the other day I spent the time examining the store&#x27;s decorative antique photos; aside from differences in culture and subject area, so many details of vehicles, building construction, clothing styles are remarkably similar.
    • balalalalalala7 minutes ago
      yes its same as america in 1950s except people dont have to fight for netanyahu xDDDD
  • aix12 days ago
    As someone who grew up in the Soviet Union (during a later period), I found it really interesting to look at this photographs.<p>One thing worth pointing out: Moscow was very different from the rest of the country. It had better housing and infrastructure, the shops were stocked far better than elsewhere in the country, it had more grandiose architecture and richer cultural life and so on.<p>In many is ways it was the country&#x27;s showcase city.
    • sherr53 minutes ago
      Nothing has changed in that regard. Moscow still receives much more monetary attention than any other city in Russia.
    • nephihaha35 minutes ago
      Moscow plus Leningrad plus Vladivostok. The rest fought for the crumbs.
    • IAmBroom1 hour ago
      So a Potemkin capital, as it were?
      • tokai58 minutes ago
        No, cause it wasn&#x27;t a fake facade. Moscow was (and is) petter on most parameters than the rest of the country.
  • balalalalalala10 minutes ago
    looks like moscow when i visit in 2017 xD same same except maybe more people are less hungry than under Putin xDD
  • obezyian2 days ago
    &gt; store №20<p>&gt; MEAT. FISH.<p>That&#x27;s some Edward Bernays-level trickery right there. &#x2F;s
    • decimalenough4 minutes ago
      Reminds me of the old Soviet joke of somebody going to the butcher and asking if they have fish. The butcher responds we only have no meat here, you need to go to the fish shop if you want no fish.
  • bediger40002 days ago
    Interesting article. Not a whole lot of crowing about US free society, and negative comparisons, I presume because of the US trending towards secret police and currently having a favorable view of Russia.