10 comments

  • ShinyLeftPad1 hour ago
    I don't speak the language but I wonder why the video doesn't show it actually entering the lane...
    • Veserv42 minutes ago
      Really, your first instinct is: &quot;The journalists are engaging a baseless smear campaign.&quot;<p>The video evidence clearly demonstrates it engaging in a clearly signed illegal maneuver that it should never have even begun. Furthermore, your mischaracterization of the video is significant. The car straightens out having crossed the pedestrian walkway clearly indicated on the dash screen. The dash screen clearly indicates the vehicle intending to continue to travel on the bike-only road.<p>In addition, this is Tesla&#x27;s own official curated video [1]. Tesla is the one who decided that failure to obey clearly indicated signs and engaging in a illegal maneuver is the best representation of their product they could muster.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;teslaeurope&#x2F;status&#x2F;2064350518907167166" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;teslaeurope&#x2F;status&#x2F;2064350518907167166</a>
    • sburud1 hour ago
      The text explains turning right at all in that intersection (as shown in the video) is illegal. Edit to add: the car ignored two different signposts, bicycle symbol painted in the lane and yellow centre-marker (indicates everything left of the cycle lane is traffic going towards you). It’s also a promotional video (not approval video), which could explain the sudden cut?
    • chrononaut58 minutes ago
      It does in the last 2 to 3 seconds. You can see the Tesla driving into it as the video ends. It is a weird spot to end the video.
      • ShinyLeftPad51 minutes ago
        I stand corrected. It doesn&#x27;t get very far but it turns into it. I didn&#x27;t notice it&#x27;s the same lane because after the cut back to approval vid signs were conveniently obscured and because it&#x27;s bike-only road not just an extra lane. They better pull the permit after this if they are serious about bicyclists in that country.
  • red75prime18 minutes ago
    A driver might get a ticket. The navigation data will be updated. The next version might be better at interpreting signs (or a better balance between the navigation data and visual perception). The end.
    • martin84125 minutes ago
      Depending on what the car does, the driver might lose a point on their drivers license.<p>Once you’ve lost three points within three years, you lose your drivers license and will have to retake it. Depending on circumstances you might have a ban for some amount of time(finite or indefinite).
    • breakpointalpha5 minutes ago
      If a driver would get a ticket, shouldn&#x27;t Tesla also get a ticket?<p>In the US, drivers kill pedestrians all the time and are barely punished.<p>Is this the same standard that should be adopted everywhere?
  • LanceJones1 hour ago
    Five EU countries have now approved, including Belgium, which is interesting considering Brussels (ECC &quot;capital&quot;).
  • dyauspitr39 minutes ago
    Self driving without lidar just inherently feels very unsafe. There are like a million things we can’t see, especially at night and in bad weather. I just wish they would suck up their pride and put in solid state lidars in their new models (which are very cheap now) so we can actually have good self driving that is actually available directly to the consumer.<p>Having watched a lot of the Tesla self driving videos. It seems to be getting pretty good but it’s still only at like 98 or 99% reliability what that means is I can’t go to sleep in the car and it needs to get to the point like a waymo where you can just go to sleep in the car.
  • lnsru1 hour ago
    So now I am in a beta test as a vehicle dummy without a chance to opt out. My model Y can’t keep lanes what my entry level Škoda does perfectly fine. My model Y slams on the brakes occasionally when I try cruise control feature on empty highway. I reported this defect as a case for warranty, but according Tesla this is fine functionality.
    • vardump51 minutes ago
      Do you mean FSD or Autosteer (or Autopilot or whatever it&#x27;s called now). I think Tesla left Autosteer purposefully crappy. FSD is excellent at keeping the lane, way better than what your Škoda can do.
      • rootusrootus37 minutes ago
        I agree it is intentional. They haven&#x27;t updated autosteer, as far as I can tell, since the Model 3 was released. Certainly my 2023 (sold a couple weeks ago) was no better than my 2019 was, and notably worse than my Ford Lightning. Outside of FSD, most everyone else makes superior TACC &amp; lane centering now.
      • speedgoose34 minutes ago
        I feel like many won’t consider FSD if their autopilot doesn’t work well.<p>Maybe they did some market analysis. I find the idea that a shitty autopilot will trigger FSD conversions to be very optimistic.
      • jerlam46 minutes ago
        Autosteer is disabled on all new vehicles too, part of forcing people to buy FSD.
    • threetonesun50 minutes ago
      You can opt out by selling it. I suppose if you think it&#x27;s enough of an issue you could do us all a favor and just have it crushed.
      • breakpointalpha3 minutes ago
        As a pedestrian, can you sell your neighbor&#x27;s dangerous car?
      • martin841232 minutes ago
        How does that help everyone else on the streets? Everyone becomes a victim of poorly working automated driving.
  • jgalt2121 hour ago
    Reality Distortion Field in full effect.
  • Psillisp1 hour ago
    Bike Street
  • dominotw1 hour ago
    because thats what elon would do
  • shevy-java1 hour ago
    At first I thought Tesla AI is stupid, trying to kill humans here.<p>Then I realised: skynet has begun ... it does not care about humans.
    • spacedcowboy45 minutes ago
      Skynet has indeed begun. There was a post recently about the very first time completely independent non-humans chose to kill humans (Russians) in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
      • robotresearcher12 minutes ago
        I’m pretty sure non-human tigers have been killing humans for ages.
  • lightedman1 hour ago
    Might make sense, in California&#x27;s driver handbook you&#x27;re required to pull into the bike lane to make a turn if the bike lane is there. Part of that programming should have already existed given where Teslas were made.
    • Veserv59 minutes ago
      No, as can be clearly seen from the video, it is doing a right turn onto a road where the only lane is a full-size lane with a sign indicating that cars are not allowed to use that road in that direction.
    • seanclayton57 minutes ago
      Makes sense to use software modeled on California laws in software made for Denmark&#x27;s laws for sure.
    • rootusrootus33 minutes ago
      That&#x27;s wild. In Oregon you will get a ticket for driving in the bike lane at all, turn or not. The only exception are bike lanes that go straight and briefly share a turning lane, but those are clearly marked for that purpose.<p>Good reminder that you should always be aware of <i>local</i> traffic laws when you travel, most places in the US are <i>similar</i> but not identical.
    • runarberg49 minutes ago
      If there is a sign which explicitly bans cars from entering it is still illegal (I assume; I never took the drivers license in California). In the video you can clearly see the street has a sign that says no cars and no motorcycles. The Tesla presumably saw that sign and either doesn’t recognize it (unlikely) or has a software telling the car to ignore it (more likely).
    • stefan_59 minutes ago
      This is a lane only for bikes, with no car lane going the same direction. It&#x27;s like turning onto train tracks (and if you keep going down it, you might well be stuck).
    • bluecalm37 minutes ago
      Dude, there is a sign saying it&#x27;s not a road for cars. Its driving into a road its banned from entering. It means Tesla can&#x27;t even read road signs.