This idea reads like a joke, but there's something to it.<p>One feature request: In addition to high-level milestones, it would be cool if a partially-funded project would generate a public, highly detailed implementation plan.<p>Also, IANAL but MIT is still a license with a copyright holder. I don't think saying "it's MIT, we all own it" is defensible. The courts might view all this code as public domain.
I love how even the "demo build" doesn't work. <a href="https://fablepool.com/projects/7" rel="nofollow">https://fablepool.com/projects/7</a><p>Rather, it did work at milestone 14, but then regressed at milestone 15, where it changed the link from a wikimedia image to a nonexistent file in /assets (despite still having the "Photo via Wikimedia Commons" caption).
Hear me out: the same idea, but hire live developers.<p>(Given the price of tokens, it can even be not entirely a joke.)
Not affordable, unless the devs are in somewhere like Vietnam. And there's still no way they can build as fast. And still, at that price point, quality would be highly questionable. So yh this doesn't survive beyond the joke stage.
If you put that behind an API, you could sell the service much like the AI providers
Thats called Kickstarter
Before putting in money to this small anonymous website, I'd love to hear about the people behind the project. There's a single mention of 'Barras Industries', but not much mention about them online, or what else they've worked on.
Brilliant idea! We need consensus protocols for voting on phases. Similar to the "twitch" plays Pokemon phenomenom.
I feel like using Fable in the name is a mistake, who knows how long that model will be around.
You could call it aiproductsexchange.com
It's how they name classes of models, presumably this implies something about the relative quantization / size of model, not about the specific performance. E.g. Fabel 5 will be better than Opus 5, better than Sonnet 5, etc. The 5 is the version number of the particular iteration / training run at this class of model.
xda-developers.com vs <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O2_Xda" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O2_Xda</a>
Everything turns into a computer game and entertainment.<p>Maybe add a "Build a worm that shuts down all Anthropic data centers."
So the completed sample was estimated at $0.35, actually cost $0.52, but spend $0.55<p>This bot is almost as bad as I am at estimating projects.
Fantastic idea for a rug pull
Kinda fun but the approach today is strictly oneshot. Waiting for agentswithwallets to post.
<a href="https://fablepool.com/projects/7" rel="nofollow">https://fablepool.com/projects/7</a> It didn't even put a picture in!
Is this the new open source?
This is literally an idea by the primegean on his YouTube under predictions. Self prophecy really with his reach but credit where it's due?
This is a good idea and for features and modifications you can make it so whoever chips in the most money gets more votes.<p>This is one of those ideas that sounds bad on paper (Like people renting out their houses. But if implemented correctly could get some traction.
Hell yeah, $516 for a complete AWS replacement, I'm in lol!
This is a fantastic idea.<p>There are lots of projects, software that shouldn't be SaaS subscriptions that Fable can build in public that can be free for everyone and also OSS.
[dead]
This is such a good idea. Hell yeah