3 comments

  • noelwelsh1 hour ago
    I wish people would describe in more detail the tasks they use LLMs to code. My experience is that simple components in an existing architecture are fine, but anything requiring architectural considerations quickly becomes a mess. On my projects (e.g. a ui framework), running multiple agents in parallel would just increase the speed at which it can stuff up the project.
    • properbrew49 minutes ago
      I used LLMs to develop Whistle Enterprise (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;whistle-enterprise.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;whistle-enterprise.com</a>) from the ground up, from scratch.<p>It&#x27;s taken _a lot_ of time and effort, but this is an example of what can be developed using LLMs alone.<p>You have to have dedication and a goal to reach, but you can absolutely build anything if you&#x27;re building with the right foundations in mind.
    • nullbio1 hour ago
      It&#x27;s great for people who are just maintaining something. Less so for someone building something from scratch, in the earlier phases.
    • Npovview27 minutes ago
      There are hour long youtube videos where people explain the process by using a complex toy project. Search for them.
  • brcmthrowaway17 minutes ago
    More Yegge tier psychosis.
  • yieldcrv1 hour ago
    I don&#x27;t know if I’m overly critical but there’s gotta be a middle ground between totally AI pilled people that otherwise have no talents, and control freak veteran developers who cant let go<p>My current process is also using Github projects in a normal scrum style way, with many tickets written or fleshed out and state managed by the LLM, and it doubling as the memory system<p>Completely leapfrogging all these other open and closed source concoctions and being more effective<p>But its effective enough that I don’t need OP’s final form state of still approving everything<p>Auto-mode is fine. Worktrees are built into Claude Code now. I just tell it to classify tickets as sequential or parallel possible and spawn subagents to tackle all of the tickets in the todo list<p>They all get their own context window its pretty perfect now<p>in the meantime I work in a couple tabs of Claude Design for different flows of any client side app. My philosophy has been that devs could pick up graphic and UI&#x2F;UX design easily, its just still a full time job to make variations of layouts and portray their states.<p>UI&#x2F;UX is not a full time job anymore.<p>And I use Claude chat to flesh out aspects of the overall idea<p>I think you may be overcomplicating your workflow in the concluding state.<p>Overall I agree that planning and intention is now most of the time, before a 10 subagent precision strike is initiated