7 comments

  • rascal99910 minutes ago
    I&#x27;m working on something similar - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;synlace&#x2F;ferret" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;synlace&#x2F;ferret</a>
  • beernutz50 minutes ago
    I don&#x27;t see how you actually see the web interface for the traffic it is tossing, and that is not explained in your readme so far as I have found.<p>I have it running in docker with docker run --rm \ --name oproxy \ --ulimit nofile=65535:65535 \ -p 8080:8080 \ -p 1080:1080 \ -e OPROXY_BIND_HOST=0.0.0.0 \ -e OPROXY_MITM_ENABLED=true \ -v oproxy-certs:&#x2F;app&#x2F;certs \ -v oproxy-storage:&#x2F;app&#x2F;storage \ ghcr.io&#x2F;sauravrao637&#x2F;oproxy:latest<p>and I set the proxy to use it, and it appears to work, but I don&#x27;t have a way to see what it is doing.
  • simon841 hour ago
    I can understand the motivation for CLI-based clients, but the browser built-in network inspector overlaps a lot.<p>There is more to Oproxy with traffic shaping but would it be enough to convince ? Spawning a Docker is easy today but it would be less friction with a normal app imho.
  • sauravrao6375 hours ago
    If you try it out, I&#x27;d appreciate feedback on the assistant. It&#x27;s still experimental but I am curious about its usability.
  • eloh2 hours ago
    How does it compare to mitmproxy?
  • vladsiu1 hour ago
    [dead]
  • framel2 hours ago
    slop