19 comments

  • tapoxi1 hour ago
    I&#x27;ve been running GitLab internally on k8s for 6 years, it handles code, CI, security scans, build artifacts, helm charts, etc. It runs a nightly backup to a GCS bucket.<p>Monthly upgrades are painless. Once a year the major versions (18 to 19, for example) bump external dependencies and we need about an hour on it.<p>I&#x27;ve been using GitHub for other projects and for the life of me I can&#x27;t see a single area where its better. Actions is worse without versioned and self documenting components, there&#x27;s no concept of a project hierarchy or inherited permissions, even simple things like setting up deploy keys are more annoying than they need to be.<p>I can&#x27;t speak for GitLab.com - I&#x27;ve never used it.
    • gchamonlive1 hour ago
      Gitlab.com used to be slightly less available than GitHub but recently I think the tables have turned and Gitlab saas is relatively stable.<p>I also enjoy Gitlab as a platform. It&#x27;s got everything, good board, good repo, good issues, good CI, extremely good registries. It&#x27;s got the equivalent of gists and pages... It a better product all things considered.<p>GitHub just wins because of popularity. It&#x27;s WordPress all over again, the thing people use because it&#x27;s a thing people use.
    • liquidgecka1 hour ago
      &gt; I&#x27;ve been using GitHub for other projects and for the life of me I can&#x27;t see a single area where its better.<p>Triggering github actions manually is way, way cleaner. Also the pipeline configuration feels cleaner to me bit that might be personal preference more than anything else.. Otherwise I agree. =)
    • foobarian47 minutes ago
      Enterprise pricing is a huge factor.
  • paulbjensen1 hour ago
    Anyone who deletes Microsoft Teams deserves a raise.
    • psygn891 hour ago
      Harsh, but fair.
      • burnte51 minutes ago
        And yet still better than Google Meet&#x2F;Calendar&#x2F;Workspace.
  • progbits1 hour ago
    Huh, this is an incident now?<p>Our github-&gt;slack subscription breaks every few months, they never acknowledged it before. At this point we have a doc with the list of repos and settings, whenever someone notices that things are awfully quiet we just go through it and resubscribe.
    • mynameisvlad58 minutes ago
      I think Slack requires reauthorization after some time. I get asked to sign back in to various accounts after a while.
  • zikohh1 hour ago
    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;isgithubcooked.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;isgithubcooked.com&#x2F;</a>
  • pluc1 hour ago
    I&#x27;m sure AI will fix it
  • rsingel1 hour ago
    Maybe count this in the &quot;feature,not a big&quot; column?<p>Github is making engineers more productive by turning off distracting fake work tools
  • natas1 hour ago
    How long before github deletes all repos? or make private repos public? and such and such?
  • inetknght1 hour ago
    I saw this show up in RSS feed on Slack before here. Interesting, posted a message about it.<p>Not 2 minutes later, a coworker sent a message saying they got a message: their repository messages couldn&#x27;t be sent, because the user is no longer authorized. The coworker was worried that they might be fired.<p>Alas, this economy is a terrible time for one business&#x27;s fuckups to cause worry about people being fired. That&#x27;s a lot of stress, man!<p>If only it were measurable in dollars, then we could sue Microsoft for damages. Maybe then Microsoft might stop producing slop. Ahh, wait. Who am I kidding? No, of course that won&#x27;t cause Microsoft to stop producing slop.
  • doublerabbit1 hour ago
    Namecheap suspending neocities, and now Github deleting subscriptions. I am all for the watching the world burn.
  • rvz30 minutes ago
    So they lasted 9 days [0] until another incident and this time they deleted subscriptions for Slack and MS Teams?<p>GitHub&#x27;s reputation has been long overcooked and you are better off self-hosting and you would have better up time than GitHub.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=48293202">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=48293202</a>
  • frays1 hour ago
    I’d ask how this happens, but I’m afraid the answer would just be more disappointing.
  • ginkgotree1 hour ago
    five bucks says this was Claude
    • SV_BubbleTime1 hour ago
      Anthropic coming out quick to say it was Human Error that leaked all their Claude Code source… 110% confirmed to me that it was Claude that was involved.<p>There was a trillion dollars pushing for them to quickly say it wasn’t.
  • ufocia1 hour ago
    Probably agentic gone wrong again.
  • OutOfHere42 minutes ago
    When will the industry acknowledge that unreviewed vibe coding is not acceptable? The term itself is an offense to common sense. It should not have been given any legitimacy.<p>I blame the one who coined it -- for having created an entire career based on vibes, namely vibe driving, vibe neural networking, and finally vibe coding -- none of them work.
    • lackoftactics29 minutes ago
      Andrei Karpathy coined it.You can talk to him, but he is probably too busy with the big leagues now.
      • OutOfHere22 minutes ago
        It&#x27;s nice to be able to exit the scene before living with the consequences of one&#x27;s authored drivel, letting it become someone else&#x27;s problem to cleanup.
  • Chinjut1 hour ago
    One bug after another over at GitHub. What is going on over there?
    • joezydeco1 hour ago
      The migration to Azure. Maybe AI. ¿Por qué no los dos?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;damrnelson.github.io&#x2F;github-historical-uptime&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;damrnelson.github.io&#x2F;github-historical-uptime&#x2F;</a>
      • loloquwowndueo1 hour ago
        “Por qué” not “porque”. One means “why” the other “because”.
    • steve19771 hour ago
      Reliance on AI and stupidification of humans I guess.
    • phpdave111 hour ago
      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dayswithoutgithubincident.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dayswithoutgithubincident.com&#x2F;</a>
    • subscribed1 hour ago
      &gt; &quot;As much as 30% of Microslop&#x27;s code is now written by artificial intelligence&quot;*<p>*approximately 8% of the above quote has been adjusted to better reflect the impact of the Ai.
      • serf1 hour ago
        rewrite the quote for comic relief <i>or</i> use quotes to signify accuracy to the spoken line .[0]<p><i>not both</i> , please.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2025&#x2F;04&#x2F;29&#x2F;satya-nadella-says-as-much-as-30percent-of-microsoft-code-is-written-by-ai.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2025&#x2F;04&#x2F;29&#x2F;satya-nadella-says-as-much-a...</a>
        • subscribed1 hour ago
          Fair. I added a remark that should make it clear it&#x27;s not verbatim.
    • sdevonoes1 hour ago
      Agentic coding.
  • cyberax1 hour ago
    They can&#x27;t even get the title right: &quot;Accidentally deleted subscriptions for chat integrations (Sla...&quot;<p>Utter degradation.
    • chearon1 hour ago
      That might actually be a bug in Firefox. The source text is correct and it works in Chrome. `text-overflow` shouldn&#x27;t apply to text that fit on a line...
    • ZoneZealot1 hour ago
      It&#x27;s an Atlassian Statuspage style oddity, the title is too long for a single line and it&#x27;s put an ellipsis and linebreak. But the ellipsis has overwritten the end of the content on the first line. Full title shows on the home page.
  • ieie33661 hour ago
    [dead]
  • throwaway61374650 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • gottagocode59 minutes ago
    Ramifications of the slopification