3 comments

  • jech2 hours ago
    That was a long time ago.<p>Traditionally, character&#x27;s under Unix were encoded in a locale-specific manner: ISO 8859-1 in Western Europe, ISO 8859-2 in Eastern Europe, EUC-JP in Japan, etc. In the 1990s, there was a major push to get XFree86 (the ancestor of X.Org) to switch to locale-independent UTF-8, lead mainly by Markus Kuhn and Bruno Haible.<p>The link is to Markus Kuhn&#x27;s web page, which appears to describe the UTF_8 software available around 1998 or so.
    • sheept41 minutes ago
      UTF-8 is not locale independent. You cannot correctly render multilingual UTF-8 text without also specifying its locale, and some transformations like uppercase&#x2F;lowercase also depend on the locale.
      • sourcegrift17 minutes ago
        Eg: some cjk characters render differently based on whether mainland China, Taiwan, or Japan. One example 骨 (from my old notes so tiny chance this example is incorrect)
  • j16sdiz7 minutes ago
    &gt; created 1998-09-22 – last modified 2022-12-07
  • ufocia1 hour ago
    A font is not a typeface