> <i>In this Gemini-reconstructed scene, ...</i><p>I'm generally pretty pro-AI, but I find this icky. Of course, I wouldn't have noticed except the whiteboard drawing seemed not quite right, so I'll probably be fooled in the future.
Based on what I've heard, Google is monitoring per-org usage and strongly / incessantly encouraging teams to experiment with the technology, so a lot of tokens get spent on pointless stuff like that. The preceding diagram, which is needlessly busy and blurry, appears to be AI-generated too.
Came here to say the same thing. Why add this fake image?
My guess is that the original whiteboard probably contained a mix of messy drawings and confidential stuff, and whoever assembled this article asked gemini to make the whiteboard look nicer. The first thing I noticed was that the drawings and labels look too neat compared to what I usually see on whiteboards, and the second thing I saw was the gemini watermark in the corner.
Weird they don't name Jon Sneyers - a person pivotal in creation of JPEG XL<p>Here's a blog post by him: <a href="https://cloudinary.com/blog/2026-the-year-of-jpeg-xl" rel="nofollow">https://cloudinary.com/blog/2026-the-year-of-jpeg-xl</a>
That's rich coming from the company that tried to kill it. The audacity...
> <i>That's rich coming from the company that tried to kill it</i><p>This post is written by three of the authors of the JPEG XL spec, implementors of the reference and rust implementations of libjxl, and...longtime google employees.
> Safari (2023) led among major browsers, while Firefox and Chrome currently maintain experimental support.
[dead]
Out of experimental when?
AI slop article
[flagged]