> The switches start out gray and become black when toggled.<p>Rant: That type of slider-switch is an inferior usurper of the classic tickbox, that rode in on a wave of touch-screen-ification. Oh, it <i>can</i> be done well, sometimes, but it's just far-too-easy to do it badly.<p>In this case (useless colors, no intrinsic text labels, etc.) I think the remaining rule/clue is "Move the dot-nub towards whatever you want." So moving right is indicating you like the "We track you" text, while moving left indicates some kind of disagreement.<p>_____________________<p>> It feels intentionally misleading.<p>The "Accept All" button is worse:<p>1. It abuses UI conventions of position and color that belong to a "Proceed with what is shown" button.<p>2. Likewise, the text-label is ambiguous: It <i>could</i> mean "Accept All [of the choices which I've made and can see]"... But instead it means "<i>Reject</i> whatever is on-screen, and replace all choices with 'accept' cookies."<p>3. When it does erase/reset all choices made, it does so in a secretive way by also submitting and vanishing the dialog. The user never has any opportunity to realize that the machine implicitly flipped all choices to the right-most position.<p>Any one of these might be an innocent mistake, but all three sins together are a dark-pattern.