3 comments

  • mrec3 hours ago
    &gt; <i>Over the next few days, the owl makes 16 more strikes at mice, missing only four times, each time by less than two inches.</i><p>How did the experimenter measure miss distance in pitch darkness? IR illumination is presumably out in case the owl was able to see it, and I didn&#x27;t think thermal imaging was a thing yet in the late &#x27;50s.
    • __patchbit__13 minutes ago
      Scratch markings on wax flooring beneath the leaf cover or the grid location on the floor was instrumented to report to telemetry when carrying weight of the owl. Assuming the mouse had its ankle rope tied to a pin nailed into the floor.
    • gucci-on-fleek2 hours ago
      Completely random guess, but perhaps ultrasonically? Ultrasonic rangefinders are relatively cheap and accurate these days, so maybe they were too in the &#x27;50s?
  • smusamashah3 hours ago
    Reminded if this video immediately <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;-WigEGNnuTE" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;-WigEGNnuTE</a> they got almost nothing on the mics.
    • smackay13 minutes ago
      Look at how pure the signal is from the peregrine&#x27;s wings. The signal from feral pigeon is extremely noisy in comparison, as if it is fighting to stay the in the air. The peregrine wingbeat is clean so I presume the energy is being turned into velocity with high efficiency. Extremely cool.
  • nelox1 hour ago
    MIT should know better that Natural Selection ≠ Genius