1 comments

  • Avicebron1 hour ago
    This feels like an admission there isn&#x27;t any &quot;AGI&quot; breakthroughs down the yellow brick road if the recommendation is basically to build bespoke vertically integrated &quot;AI stacks&quot;.<p>Which I think has been discussed in a least a handful of meetings I have been in recently. This seems uniquely challenging because<p>1) many business processes that could integrate AI are inherently fuzzy because they are designed to absorb edge cases (this is very common in the small-to-medium sized business domain)<p>2) A non-trivial number of the domains where a custom software stack is useful (now with AI!) are under specific security requirements where offloading data into a 3rd party inference engine is untrodden ground (compliance-wise)<p>3) What happens when the word gets out, well hey, we need _more_ programmers to rebuild all of the business processes around this new AI-integrated-workflow, does that go over well with the promise of replacing all labor with AI?
    • NewJazz2 minutes ago
      [delayed]
    • jordanb47 minutes ago
      Yes this is completely opposite the &quot;bitter lesson&quot; and coming from a16z seems to be an admission that scaling is done.