Probably the bigger headline here is that they’ve blown past OpenAI in revenue and valuation, with OpenAI looking increasingly shaky and vulnerable.
Anthropic is at the mercy of 3rd party datacenter contracts. AFAIK OpenAI will soon run mostly on on their own GPUs.<p>I don't like Altman and I am still upset about his memory deal last year but he prepared for the current shortages months before anybody else. Meanwhile, Anthropic seems to lack any plans besides third party contracting. IMHO they got very lucky with xAI and Google having spare capacity and willing to rent it. But what about next year?
Which also leaves OpenAI vulnerable to NVidia's aggressive pricing. To my knowledge Anthropic is relatively well positioned across multiple compute vendors/hardware providers.
Stargate is not real.<p>It is not clear that running one's own datacenter is a competitive advantage. Why do you think OpenAI can handle that?
How? OpenAI and Antrophic are basically the Big 2 racing away at light speed; the others who can't get near them are may be shaky and vulnerable. And sure, there's a garden full of those.
[dead]
I’m not so sure. We only need to look at Uber’s example of companies realizing they’re spending way too much and trying to rein it in. Claude has excellent revenue but it is highly dependent on very rich technology companies continuing to spend lavishly without seeing returns. The music will stop at some point and Anthropic will be hit the hardest. OpenAI may have less revenue but it is distributed across many, many more customers and use cases, it’s resilient. And even if Anthropic do, somehow, manage to keep their customers spending huge amounts on Claude, they’re very vulnerable to being undercut by OpenAI given codex is pretty much at parity. Anthropic seems more vulnerable to me.
I think it's somewhat guaranteed that the music will at least die down a little bit. We saw this with cloud companies being bitten by cloud cost optimization initiatives. I can't imagine we won't see the same with AI, especially as the workforce stops trying to tokenmaxx to save their role.
Every week there's at least one post on the HN front page bitching about API errors from Claude because Anthropic doesn't have enough serving capacity. I really don't see any signs they're "spending too much", the actual evidence on the ground seems to be exactly the opposite: constant exasperation that they're not spending enough.
What he means is the customers realizing they are spending too much on Anthropic.
I mean Anthropic’s customers are spending too much on Claude. Anthropic’s customers are encouraging tokenmaxxing amongst their employees; measuring employees by token usage. That’s great for Anthropic’s short term revenue numbers but terrible long term because at some point companies will realize tokenmaxxing is not good. OpenAI is much less exposed to tokenmaxxing, which is a good thing.
As someone who knows admittedly knows nothing about startup funding rounds, how many more rounds of funding can they do before an IPO? Is it effectively infinite?
Effectively infinite. Databricks is a good example. They're still private after 13 years and closed a Series L round last year. Stripe is similar.<p>Having been through an IPO before, it was good for employee liquidity, but bad for the culture and long-term success of the company.
Dead capital. There's no need for public funding until they are reasy to cash out at the top, if ever.
so how do stripe employees get liquidity? can anyone sell their secondary shares?
I can't speak for the specific case of Stripe, but it's fairly common for private companies to have a "tender offer" in which employees have the opportunity to sell some portion of their equity. This is often done in conjunction with a new investment round.
Private/secondary markets.
Tender offers.<p><a href="https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/investing-basics/glossary/tender-offer" rel="nofollow">https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/investing-ba...</a><p><a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/tender_offer" rel="nofollow">https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/tender_offer</a><p><a href="https://carta.com/learn/equity/liquidity-events/tender-offer/" rel="nofollow">https://carta.com/learn/equity/liquidity-events/tender-offer...</a><p><a href="https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&query=stripe%20tender%20offer&sort=byDate&type=story" rel="nofollow">https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...</a><p>(secondary markets are sometimes an option, depending on stock restrictions)
Stripe might buy back the shares at a good price. They might be able to sell on secondary markets.
I believe the canonical example is Databricks on round L
I imagine there are ways for existing investors to achieve liquidity while still raising venture funding. But an IPO is "the" liquidity event and I imagine there will be pressure from investors for that.<p>I also imagine that venture funding rounds have a lower ceiling than the public markets - but at these rounds I'm not so sure!
usually you would go through seed funding, the series a,b, and possibly a1 and b1. If you entered c or d territory it meant that you still had a chance but vc would be following you very closely. After d, you could raise money, but it would be under very unfavorable conditions
they can do as many as they want. but at some point investors need/want to exit their positions and push for an IPO. That point is different for every company.
Depends on the investors if they see growth. The downside is dilution. Preferably they just want the Series I as the IPO in this case.<p>They cannot raise forever, SpaceX has done more rounds but the <i>timing</i> is most important.
Yes, whatever you like
Say you join Anthropic now as an employee. What are the chances of your equity appreciating in value? I don't think we have any historical precedents to this.
So close to being the first kilocorn. A unicorn = 1 billion, this is almost 1k.
That announcement is a bit short on details. I suppose that, like in the previous rounds, there are some strings attached and they'll not get all of it at once.<p>Hynix is participating with a new circular deal. Hynix is also valued at $1 trillion now, which is positively insane.<p>This scam will implode harder that the housing bubble.
They're going to run out of letters pretty soon.
Boys we got more subsidy for Claude Code Plans! Let the VC financed spending of 1000$ of datacenter cost for 200$ sales price continue!
I'll have some of that joint they be smokin'<p>/s
[dead]
Revenue up to $47B. Looking forward to the Ed Zitron hot take on this one! No doubt he will fling more baseless accusations of fraud and other nonsense.
*run-rate revenue<p>Without more information, this number is impossible to interpret.
Unless you have access to Anthropics book your claim is as baseless as Ed Zitron's ...
What do they then need another $65B for? To sell 200$ plans that cost them 1000$ to fullfill.<p>I can have $47B in revenue if I sell something that cost $80B to produce ez pz.
[flagged]
This is likely the last fund raise before going public.<p>You can't spell Anthropic or OpenAI without "IPO". You can remove the "c" in anthropic, reverse it and the first 3 letters is "ipo".<p>But you certainly can spell both of them without "AGI".<p>Therefore, "AGI" is a complete scam and it actually was meant to be a giant IPO.
you also can't write openai without a pen
I think your conclusion might be right that AGI does just feel a bunch of hype but the reasoning in middle feels flawed...<p>like how 13^2=169 and 31^2=961 or 10^2+11^2+12^2=13^2+14^2
Airtight logic
9k karma, whew