4 comments

  • Retr0id8 minutes ago
    Is the source code available for review?
  • bear33027 minutes ago
    maybe encrypt in localhost then send to another securely is another option? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;nuwainfo&#x2F;ffl" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;nuwainfo&#x2F;ffl</a> also decrypt using webcryto
  • Gigachad55 minutes ago
    Looks nice, but I just can’t imagine the use case where you care about security enough to encrypt a file, but not enough that you trust a random website with it.
    • radical_halogen43 minutes ago
      Here&#x27;s the other one I know of that has some degree of trust (non browser based also available)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pteo.paranoiaworks.mobi&#x2F;en&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pteo.paranoiaworks.mobi&#x2F;en&#x2F;</a><p>It says it is client side you could also download the page with what and open the html file for added assurance
    • unixlor52 minutes ago
      I see the point, keep in mind encryption etc all runs client side. would obviously never recommend to encrypt anything sensetive or critical on a website :D
      • Gigachad45 minutes ago
        While that&#x27;s all well and good. The problem is a website can update it&#x27;s code every time you load it. So while the user can audit nothing is being sent, they would have to do this every time they load it.<p>While I think the UI is super nice here. I&#x27;d personally stick to a trusted tool from an org and project with a good reputation and long history.
        • pizzly9 minutes ago
          Could we automate the auditing of the website every time it runs?
        • unixlor43 minutes ago
          agreed, i&#x27;ll see if there&#x27;s a good way for me to prove when and what changed maybe be uploading to github and keeping it open source
    • unixlor46 minutes ago
      [flagged]
  • unixlor1 hour ago
    [flagged]