3 comments

  • lexicality11 minutes ago
    Given I&#x27;ve spent the last few weeks teaching myself CAD and completely designing a custom 3d printed racking system for my consumer networking gear from scratch, I would like to think that &quot;I decided to do this ostensibly stupid and pointlessly difficult thing for a minor aesthetic improvement even when a blatantly easier (and possibly better) option is available&quot; is a valid reason for humans to do things.<p>Besides, that green quartz crystal is beautiful. If you can only afford to carry a limited number of objects then I personally would try to find a way to turn it into an object I can hold, use, and admire every day.
  • vintermann1 hour ago
    I&#x27;m always suspicious of &quot;it was religious&quot; claims in archeology.
    • defrost1 hour ago
      Neither the article nor the backing paper discussed made any such definite claim.<p>Many casual readers confuse statements such as<p><pre><code> &quot;which *may* have had symbolic or ritual significance.&quot; </code></pre> with meaning &quot;absolutely had to do with (a) religion&quot; ?<p>Attribution of potential cause of inferred behaviour to &quot;ritual&quot; is a long standing practice in archaeology; it&#x27;s code for &quot;we don&#x27;t know&quot; and covers all manner of things that may simply have developed as habit over years, may have unknown and non supernatural causes &#x2F; motivations, etc.
  • mring336212 days ago
    Because it looks cool!
    • AngryData1 hour ago
      This is what I would bet on. If you spent decades of your life knapping various &quot;easy&quot; and ideal stones for tools and getting quite skilled at it, it doesn&#x27;t seem like much of a stretch for them to try knapping a &quot;difficult&quot; stone just because it looks cooler and you can show it off.
    • moscoe1 hour ago
      Exactly. Same reason kids and people today are drawn to it and gems in general. Even today, people imbue crystals with mystical properties.