Trillions in Retirement Dollars Flow into Opaque Trusts

3 comments

• metadat1 hour ago
  <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.today&#x2F;8jwJl" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.today&#x2F;8jwJl</a>
• cowsandmilk49 minutes ago
  This article feels overblown.<p>Here’s a trust that has 250 billion, but reports prices and does many other things the article says isn’t required: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;workplace.vanguard.com&#x2F;investments&#x2F;product-details&#x2F;fund&#x2F;2040" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;workplace.vanguard.com&#x2F;investments&#x2F;product-details&#x2F;f...</a><p>Not opaque and it has lower fees than the retail S&amp;P 500 funds.
  • bombcar35 minutes ago
    Using Vanguard anything as a counter-example isn&#x27;t terribly persuasive; they&#x27;re unique in the market.
    • cowsandmilk24 minutes ago
      Given the Bloomberg article explicitly calls out Vanguard, I don’t think using it as a counter-example is inappropriate.
• legalmoneytalk1 hour ago
  [flagged]