4 comments

  • deater5 hours ago
    There are probably so many stories out there of interesting things she did. A few are breifly referenced at her old website here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20060116130917&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.csl.cornell.edu&#x2F;~sam&#x2F;personal.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20060116130917&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.csl.co...</a>
    • codaea39 minutes ago
      Her babysitter was Mike Bloomfield!? (the astronaut)
    • tkhattra41 minutes ago
      rip. i got a chuckle out of this trivia on her old website:<p>&gt; Rob Pike didn&#x27;t really name my favorite editor after me.
  • DespairYeMighty6 hours ago
    She was a CS PhD and somewhat itinerant professor with a long career who wrote a prominent CS paper about computer memory, <i>Hitting the Memory Wall: Implications of the Obvious</i><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dl.acm.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.1145&#x2F;216585.216588" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dl.acm.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.1145&#x2F;216585.216588</a><p>on her obituary page, you will see a prominent &quot;Memory Wall&quot; link that is NOT a reference to her paper, but a place for sharing your thoughts about her life
    • deater5 hours ago
      you wouldn&#x27;t believe how many people cite that paper as &quot;Wulf et al.&quot; when that&#x27;s practically more characters than saying &quot;Wulf and McKee&quot;<p>I notice these things a bit more as she was my PhD thesis advisor
      • marricks4 hours ago
        There&#x27;s only two authors! That&#x27;s so rude!
        • setgree1 hour ago
          It’s also not correct; et al. is conventionally applied to three or more authors (it means “and others,” plural)
        • bjourne1 hour ago
          Why? For all the automatic academic score tracking systems it doesn&#x27;t matter one bit if it is Wulf et al. or Wulf and McKee.
          • mattkrause9 minutes ago
            The automated ones don&#x27;t care, but it absolutely matters for the informal credit assignment process that actually runs academia.<p>I really wish we had a better way to &quot;name&quot; papers. Big clinical trials often have an acronym (often hilariously forced: &quot;CXCessoR4&quot;). That takes the emphasis off (one) lead author but it&#x27;s implausibly hard to make up one for every research paper.
          • john_strinlai1 hour ago
            its about respect, not about academic score tracking systems
      • SecretDreams2 hours ago
        et al should never be applied when only two authors!!!
        • fsckboy45 minutes ago
          ...unless the second one is named Alfred and is an informal person
    • b473a3 hours ago
      Yeah tenure is nice but there&#x27;s just a hint of mystery behind the title &quot;itinerant professor.&quot; Like a wizard that just pops up in places to work computer science magic.
  • akkartik6 hours ago
    My dissertation was on the memory wall, and I never heard of her :&#x2F; RIP
    • AnimalMuppet4 hours ago
      Could you (or someone else in the know) give us a brief overview of the current state of the memory wall issue?
      • Veserv49 minutes ago
        High bandwidth memory (HBM) can deliver TB&#x2F;s of memory bandwidth and has completely shattered the memory wall for individual cores&#x2F;compute elements. The only way for compute to keep up is going wide and parallel as seen in GPUs.<p>Despite this, massively increased memory bandwidth does not translate to material performance improvements on non-parallel compute tasks because few tasks are actually memory bandwidth bound, instead being memory latency bound.<p>The best known general solutions for improving memory latency are per-compute element memory caches. Unfortunately, this increases the complexity and size of your compute elements forcing you to reduce the number of compute elements, but a large number of compute elements is the only way to saturate HBM memory bandwidth.<p>To keep up the best known techniques are either algorithmically batch which allows you to go wide using vector&#x2F;batch instructions or you go the GPU route with memory latency-hiding parallelism.
      • akkartik3 hours ago
        Oh my knowledge is woefully out of date. But I believe the memory wall is a fact of life for the most part. Like many others, I nibbled around the edges of the constraint at massive cost in increased complexity. Outside of very specific exceptions the cure tends to be worse than the disease.
      • dirtbagskier3 hours ago
        [dead]
  • dyauspitr1 hour ago
    I’m never heard of that term.
    • northes1 hour ago
      Thanks for your contribution, then.