12 comments

  • ollin12 hours ago
    Hank Green has a video walking through how to use the timeline here <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=LyZE9VWJjDA" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=LyZE9VWJjDA</a>. For me, the best experience was to click &quot;Crew Photos Only&quot; and then step through the photos chronologically with the arrow buttons.
    • nobrains3 hours ago
      I REALLY liked the interface. One nitpick: When the image description is ON, the left and right buttons keep moving up and down after every image, so I cannot keep my mouse in one location and keep clicking NEXT.
      • wazoox1 hour ago
        You can browse the pictures with the cursor keys, though.
    • rkagerer10 hours ago
      Cool! Honestly though, just hitting the &quot;right arrow&quot; button on my keyboard it was a blast. Such a great mix of photos and short vids, several clearly impromptu and unvarnished, felt real.
  • dylan60412 hours ago
    Some of these images from the lunar observations gives me a weird perspective where the moon is really small and the features are like rain drops in really soft sand. Not sure if it&#x27;s because my brain &quot;knows&quot; the size of the earth, and is seeing the moon as super close and forcing the perspective??? This one in particular: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artemistimeline.com&#x2F;#a-setting-earth" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artemistimeline.com&#x2F;#a-setting-earth</a>
    • LeoPanthera9 hours ago
      It&#x27;s partly because everything&#x27;s in focus. We&#x27;re not used to seeing images with such enormous distances.
      • jameshart8 hours ago
        There&#x27;s also no distance haze effect; there&#x27;s a single point source of light and no atmospheric scattering illuminating the shadows. Plus it&#x27;s basically a single uniform gray texture with no variation other than the height.<p>It&#x27;s like a video game with ALL the advanced techniques we use to make things look &#x27;real&#x27; turned off, because most of those things are atmospheric effects, and this landscape lacks one.
      • 148 hours ago
        Unrelated but happened today and found funny, my dad was telling me how my brother somewhere got this miniature 2 liter bottle of Coca-Cola. It was like a couple inches in size. It was sold as a joke product to put beside fish you caught to make them appear bigger in photos.
    • jrumbut10 hours ago
      I don&#x27;t there&#x27;s anything we interact with that has a texture much like the moon&#x27;s surface.<p>That would be a cool science museum exhibit: a recreation of regolith and perhaps visitors can interact with it in a glovebox or drive an RC car.
  • merek2 hours ago
    Nice shots of Australia on Apr 02, 6:41:23 PM (left = north) and 6:42:35 PM (down = north), including Tropical Cyclone Maila (I think).
  • mr_toad3 hours ago
    The far side of the Moon has really lived.<p>I don’t think I’ve seen photos before that showed both sides in such stark contrast.
  • echelon10 hours ago
    1. This is Hank Green&#x27;s site. That&#x27;s amazing! If you don&#x27;t follow him on YouTube, you need to.<p>2. He used Claude Code! What an incredible enabler of fun little side projects it&#x27;s turning into.<p>3. This is <i>exactly</i> what the internet felt like in 2000-2006. This is amazing. Creators are making little things all over and sharing them on the indie web. Yesssss!!!
    • ghosty14150 minutes ago
      &gt; He used Claude Code! What an incredible enabler of fun little side projects it&#x27;s turning into.<p>I kinda thought so since it has <i>that look</i> to it. Blue&#x27;ish theme, rather dense, small fonts and things with borders.<p>Don&#x27;t get me wrong, I don&#x27;t mind AI being used here, quite the opposite, I&#x27;m sure without it this would never have existed in the first place. Just find it interesting that there is a certain pattern to AI-generated websites.
    • deepfriedbits8 hours ago
      Love your point about how AI tools are boosting fun side projects and how it reminds of early creator internet. Spot on.
  • user_78323 hours ago
    It&#x27;s really interesting to see see a Hank Green link on HN posted by Geerling, feels like the old internet again.<p>Oh, and if that wasn&#x27;t cool enough, apparently the creative director of NASA even posted about it, saying they&#x27;re using it internally!<p>...Though, the link appears down, and archive.org doesn&#x27;t have a copy.<p>And... archive.ph serves <i>this</i> instead?<p>Уважаемый Абонент! Доступ к Интернет-ресурсу заблокирован по решению органов государственной власти Посмотреть причину блокировки можно в едином реестре<p>Подключай Интерактивное ТВ и сам контролируй, что блокировать! Подключить © Компания TTK, 2024 г.<p>Translated:<p>Dear Subscriber! Access to the Internet resource is blocked by decision of state authorities. You can view the reason for the blocking in the unified register (Note: referring to Roskomnadzor, Russia&#x27;s censorship agency). Connect Interactive TV and control what to block yourself! (A darkly ironic advertisement) Connect © Company TTK, 2024<p>... which is weird when Russia is technically nowhere in the chain.
  • rTX5CMRXIfFG7 hours ago
    Even just seeing it all in photos is humbling. We really should take better care of our home.
  • VimEscapeArtist3 hours ago
    $244,094,488.19 per picture?
  • system211 hours ago
    April 6th is probably the best advertisement Nutella could ever make.
    • 73737373733 hours ago
      It feels like companies, especially camera manufacturers, haven&#x27;t realized the potential space exploration has for advertising their products
    • jedberg8 hours ago
      And to demonstrate the awesomeness of the crew unity, from the post landing press conference:<p>Reporter: Whose Nutella was that, that was floating by you in space?<p>Crew: That was ours. Yes, we do everything as a four-person crew.
  • SadErn10 hours ago
    [dead]