2 comments

  • urxvtcd27 minutes ago
    For an entire book about the topic, see &quot;The physics of filter coffee&quot; by Jonathan Gagné.<p>Also<p>&gt; This can be achieved using an espresso machine (figure 1), or with smaller contraptions at much lower pressures such as a moka pot or AeroPress.<p>Please, just stop. They&#x27;re not even remotely close.
  • mr_mitm46 minutes ago
    &gt; The bottom line of the team’s experiments and mathematical modelling is that to get the most reproducible shots just use less coffee and grind it more coarsely.<p>This seems to go against conventional wisdom, which says that less coffee will reduce brewing time and a coarser grind will also reduce brewing time, and consensus seems to be that you want a brewing time somewhere between 20 and 30 seconds. Or did I misunderstand something?<p>Anyway, the reasoning seems sound, so I&#x27;m going to have to give this a try.
    • sgc2 minutes ago
      They failed to mention the important point, that you have to be able to reduce the pressure to increase the grind size. I am convinced the best espresso you can make is at 6 bar, since you can grind the coarsest possible. It comes out sweeter and richer at the same time.
    • FrustratedMonky36 minutes ago
      Yeah.<p>&quot;most reproducible&quot; -&gt; Does not mean good.<p>A lot of generic weak coffee is &#x27;consistent&#x27;, but not &#x27;good&#x27;.
      • mr_mitm26 minutes ago
        Sorry, maybe I should have quoted the next line as well:<p>&gt; Pabst echoes that advice: “My recommendation for people at home, without knowing anything they are doing, 90% chance that if you use less coffee and grind a little coarser [your coffee] will actually taste better.”<p>So it&#x27;s not just about consistency, but also quality.