8 comments

  • WestCoader39 minutes ago
    Nothing is pissing me off more than GitHub&#x27;s stability going down the tubes RIGHT as work is migrating everything, and I mean everything, from CircleCI to GH.<p>The wildest thing is that Azure Repos&#x2F;Pipelines was better than this.<p>Their one caveat is also that they are still migrating it to Azure infra, so it&#x27;s possible that&#x27;s still in a one foot in one foot out kinda scenario, from what I&#x27;ve heard. But, this isn&#x27;t inspiring confidence.
    • biglyburrito2 minutes ago
      I&#x27;m on the other side of the fence. We&#x27;re just about done migrating from GitHub to GitLab (self-hosted) and it&#x27;s been refreshing to DGAF about any of the GH outages I read about.
    • gonzo4121 minutes ago
      Mee too. We just did a very similar migration at work it&#x27;s incredibly frustrating, I&#x27;ve got all my CI ported over and now this.<p>MSFT should just create slophub.com they&#x27;d make money im sure.
      • Mashimo5 minutes ago
        Honest question, why are companies interested in hosting on github?<p>As a private person I use it too as a free hoster, but from work I mainly know self hosted instances of jenkins and TeamCity.
    • sdevonoes13 minutes ago
      Why do you care about github? It’s Just another corporation doing what they know best: harvesting money. The software ecosystem can live without github just fine
  • ajdude56 minutes ago
    [Dupe] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47939579">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47939579</a>
  • erelong1 minute ago
    so where should people move to instead
  • sikozu32 minutes ago
    With Ghostty being the latest project to leave GitHub, it does make me wonder who will leave next.<p>I don&#x27;t expect everybody and their nan to leave GitHub by next wednesday and spin up their own Forgejo server, but I do think GitHub should be worried that people are finally looking to move away from them.
    • napolux29 minutes ago
      do we have already an HN user creating &quot;who-left-gh.net&quot;? (domain is free)
  • redwood7 minutes ago
    Let&#x27;s be honest there&#x27;s an order of magnitude or more higher throughput volume of PR jitter and new repo bloat which makes this look like a viral digital native at scale.. couple that with being owned by one of the most scale immature companies on the planet ... of course it&#x27;s a problem.<p>Get these folks off Azure and Cosmos DB (or whatever MSFT forces them to use) to something real and maybe you&#x27;d have a shot
  • flossly41 minutes ago
    Is it me, or did get issues get a lot worse with the transfer to MSFT?
    • Tade01 minute ago
      Even after decades, the policy is the same:<p>Embrace, extend, and extinguish.
    • sebastiansm740 minutes ago
      I think is more related to vibe coding
      • DanielHB14 minutes ago
        Definitely not, I remember some 4 years ago some random bug in a github-supported github-action and a comment in an issue saying: &quot;I heard the team responsible for this action was laid off, don&#x27;t expect a fix&quot;. This was shortly after the microsoft acquisition.<p>But the vibe coding BS probably made it 10 times worse.
        • embedding-shape8 minutes ago
          &gt; But the vibe coding BS probably made it 10 times worse.<p>Yup, keep seeing this in various companies. Teams that were effective and did solid engineering now are more effective and does even better engineering. Teams that were effectively already just &quot;boilerplate monkies&quot; now produce a lot more code than before, but the quality is the same so effectively they&#x27;re worse at contributing now than before, and take more shortcuts, not less.<p>From my point of view, agents are amplifiers, so if you usually build spaghetti projects, agents just help you do that faster, not avoid the spaghetti altogether. If you usually build well-designed stuff, they can help you put that together faster.
      • 2ndorderthought17 minutes ago
        Agreed. In general the amount and variety of bugs introduced since everyone started vibing is worrying. It is probably a national security concern but I guess so is the economy tanking due to failed AI investments. Guess we will see
    • UqWBcuFx6NV4r36 minutes ago
      Is it just me, or [thing that has been repeated a billion times every day on this and every other website]
      • zthrowaway21 minutes ago
        It certainly seems like low effort engagement farming.
    • hkt40 minutes ago
      It is absolutely not just you
  • bwb17 minutes ago
    Is Gitlab doing better at this point? Or where do they stand?
  • thiago_fm33 minutes ago
    It isn&#x27;t surprising at all, Microsoft is doing a PE firm playbook with what they buy. You don&#x27;t need to look much far, let&#x27;s think about its biggest acquisition to date, Blizzard.<p>Blizzcon canceled. All of its IP barely got any love.<p>See what players think about the latest World of Warcraft patch. It&#x27;s absolutely shit and broken. People say they fired the entire QA department since a few years back and since then the quality has just gone down.<p>They buy those businesses because they have nothing to do with that free cash flow, and for accounting reasons it makes sense to have them.<p>They didn&#x27;t buy those businesses to develop it further and make it worth more.<p>Github will just become ever more irrelevant.<p>The key issue is that the US governments let those huge monopolies exist, and then use their money to buy other businesses and enshiftify them.<p>Unless that changes in the US, this will continue happening.
    • surgical_fire4 minutes ago
      The thing is that they didn&#x27;t buy Blizzard, they bought Activision. They were interested in CoD numbers.<p>I think Diablo Immortal was likely the biggest success Blizz provided there