12 comments

  • bluGill16 minutes ago
    OPEC has long been Saudi Arabia reducing output, and everyone else selling everything they can. They haven&#x27;t had much power since the 1970s, but that they exist means they are a threat that if everyone else actually stuck to the agreement for a change.<p>This is the common problem for cartels: everyone has inventive to cheat on the deals made. By selling a little more than your share you get more money, while because everyone else is following along the prices are higher. (see also prisoners dilemma)
  • cmiles847 minutes ago
    The US has long sought to erode OPEC’s ability to dictate global oil prices. The US has made massive progress in being broadly energy independent to isolate it from challenges elsewhere. The US has been a net energy exporter since 2019. Global oil pricing was always an annoying thorn in that strategy.<p>This is an initial but big crack in shaking up global oil markets in a way that meaningfully shifts global power dynamics.
    • melling17 minutes ago
      Cheap and plentiful fossil fuels.<p>We’re rolling back CAFE standards too.
      • nradov11 minutes ago
        CAFE standards were always a stupid idea. If we want to reduce fuel usage then increase the tax on fuel instead of punishing manufacturers for selling vehicles that consumers want to buy.
    • tootie3 minutes ago
      Global pricing affects all fossil fuels and always will. Energy independence will remain a fantasy until we are fully on renewables. Which is entirely within reach and requires fighting zero wars.
    • ch4s334 minutes ago
      I think the initial crack was ousting Maduro in Venezuela. Since OPEC exempts Venezuela from production caps, it gives the US government a lever on non US production.
  • iLemming42 minutes ago
    &quot;My grandfather rode a camel, my father rode a camel, I drive a Mercedes, my son drives a Land Rover, and my grandson is going to ride a camel&quot;. Sheikh Rashid bin Saeed Al Maktoum, the former Emir of Dubai.
    • gnfargbl8 minutes ago
      Where is the Land Rover supposed to sit on this scale?<p>There are current Land Rovers with market positioning suggesting they&#x27;re &quot;better&quot; than Mercedes, and there are historic Land Rovers which were arguably not much better than camels.
    • RobRivera18 minutes ago
      Its a fun line, but the volume of money they have and the way its managed says they are looking at retaining that wealth somehow
      • bluGill8 minutes ago
        Money retrained means nothing when cheap oil is gone. Cars are only a thing because we have volumes and energy for large supply chains and scale. A rich person can afford a model-T level car, but large parts of what makes a luxury car are things that they won&#x27;t be able to get at any price without modern industry that is built on distributed wealth for many people. All the electronics - needs industry. Precision manufacturing - depends on precision electronics. You can&#x27;t even rebuild a current design if someone thinks to print out the blueprints.<p>Of course who knows how to end of oil will happen. Best case is a switch to renewables (or fission...) in which case there will be more than enough expensive oil for a few rich people to drive expensive gas cars if they want to. There are lots of other options as well, only time will tell.<p>(and a nod here to the replies who suggest this was never actually said)
  • netdur1 hour ago
    Geopolic: A US-aligned Gulf state walking away from a Saudi&#x2F;Russia-led bloc in the middle of a war, after deciding the bloc didn’t really have its back<p>Economic: it weakens OPEC’s pricing power in a way you might not see right away if Hormuz is closed, but it could really change the supply picture once things reopen
    • Havoc56 minutes ago
      UAE announced this week they might start selling oil in yuan so this doesn’t read like anything US aligned to me. If anything it reads like the opposite to me - a move away from traditional opec petrodollar system
      • eightysixfour30 minutes ago
        &gt; UAE announced this week they might start selling oil in yuan<p>That is just UAE pressure to make sure they get their dollar swap deal: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;world&#x2F;middle-east&#x2F;trump-says-currency-swap-with-uae-is-under-consideration-2026-04-21&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;world&#x2F;middle-east&#x2F;trump-says-currenc...</a>
        • Havoc24 minutes ago
          Indeed it’s leverage but at same time they only need the swap because all is not well in petrodollar land.
          • eightysixfour10 minutes ago
            I don&#x27;t think there is any evidence that they actually <i>need</i> the dollar swap line - the dirham-dollar peg isn&#x27;t at any risk and they have plenty of money for fiscal flexibility going into the foreseeable future. If you take financial reasons off of the table then it is clear it is just a political play for a bigger seat at the table with the US.<p>The Saudis did it to Biden in 2023, the UAE sees the opportunity to do it to Trump now.
      • nimbius52 minutes ago
        exactly. this sounds like a third path where the UAE charts its own course, and that course increasingly looks paved in Yuan.<p>OPEC cartel membership didnt gain it access to Hormuz, and the US petrodollar promise to protect UAE states from aggression in exchange for trade in USD could not be upheld.
        • ericmay24 minutes ago
          &gt; the US petrodollar promise to protect UAE states from aggression in exchange for trade in USD could not be upheld<p>Well the war is still ongoing, and Iran&#x27;s regime is already feeling the pain of the blockade [1]. Pricing oil in Yuan because, I guess, the US is somehow not protecting the UAE doesn&#x27;t make sense because China won&#x27;t be there to protect them either. The US can just say, well fine you can sell your oil in Yuan. But we&#x27;ll just blockade the Straight and seize oil priced in Yuan or something. Who exactly does the UAE need protection from? Iran? China&#x27;s ally?<p>I swear I read this same story over and over again. There&#x27;s always just an accusation &quot;thing happened, here&#x27;s how the US is now in a state of being screwed&quot; and there&#x27;s just never any follow-up or perhaps imagination that the US could just do something too. Hypersonic missiles? US Navy is done for, no possible counter. Iran has drones? Boom. US is <i>done for</i> no way they can spend Patriot missile money on $30,000 Iranian drones. Nope, nothing anyone can do at all. Iran &quot;closes the Straight&quot;, well the US can&#x27;t do anything. Now they are &quot;embarrassed&quot; and &quot;slammed&quot;.<p>&gt; OPEC cartel membership didnt gain it access to Hormuz<p>What does this mean?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;world&#x2F;middle-east&#x2F;iran-is-flooded-with-so-much-unsold-oil-that-its-stashing-it-in-derelict-tanks-ed8e62b1?mod=hp_lead_pos3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;world&#x2F;middle-east&#x2F;iran-is-flooded-with-s...</a>
      • elictronic24 minutes ago
        Im not concerned with them selling with the yuan as China regularly screws around with its currency. The bigger issue is and other currencies which reduces the US impact.<p>On the backside I’m sure there will be lots of fun back door deals around all those interceptors and future anti drone technologies. Today though the US has been the impetus of a lot of the current issues.
      • MattDamonSpace27 minutes ago
        “Might” and either way breaking OPEC is good for the West, regardless of their intent<p>defecting from the cartel, a tale as old as time
      • lotsofpulp44 minutes ago
        &gt;UAE announced this week they might start selling oil in yuan<p>I have read this headline dozens of times in the previous 30 years.
        • Havoc42 minutes ago
          I don’t think the gulf is in same as always mode right now
        • Eisenstein37 minutes ago
          That doesn&#x27;t mean the warnings were frivolous. There was ultimately a change in course which averted it. How sure are you that will be the case this time?
        • Cyph0n34 minutes ago
          Has the GCC been in an existential state of panic to the point where they’re seriously questioning their relationship with the US any time in the past 30 years?
          • bluGill25 minutes ago
            Someone has at several different points. It isn&#x27;t always the same someone, but someone.
            • Cyph0n21 minutes ago
              Which country?<p>Kuwait was “saved” by the US. The Iraq invasion was approved by the GCC, partly as payback for Kuwait, and anyways Iraq is not part of the GCC. The Qatar blockade was self-inflicted (and extremely stupid).
    • thaumasiotes56 minutes ago
      Russia-led? Russia isn&#x27;t even part of OPEC.
      • MobiusHorizons45 minutes ago
        I believe they are in opec+
        • willchis37 minutes ago
          That&#x27;s the ad-free version, it&#x27;s an extra $12.99 a month.
  • austin-cheney53 minutes ago
    UAE is responsible for 12-13% of OPEC output as its third most productive member.<p>In 2019 Qatar left OPEC, but nobody cared because oil is less than 10% of their national fossil fuel output, which was about 2% of OPEC&#x27;s oil output.
  • bhouston7 minutes ago
    The US is bailing out the UAE for liquify issues and this is likely a quid pro quo in return??
  • Ifkaluva15 minutes ago
    Can somebody knowledgeable help me understand why this is in the interests of the UAE? Also, seems like a moot point since the strait is closed. Why do they think it’s in their best interests, and why now?
  • nashashmi30 minutes ago
    Iran lets oil traded in Yuan to navigate the Strait. OPEC sets prices in Petrodollars. What is the point of staying in OPEC then? Qatar is not part of OPEC so they were able to trade freely in Yuan.
  • cogman101 hour ago
    &gt; The UAE&#x27;s exit from OPEC represents a win for U.S. President Donald Trump, who in a 2018 address to the U.N. General Assembly accused the organisation of &quot;ripping off the rest of the world&quot; by inflating oil prices.<p>I can&#x27;t see how it is actually a win for Trump. OPEC has mostly been a big partner with the US. They are the ones that have mandated using the dollar as the baseline currency for buying and selling OPEC oil.<p>The UAE&#x27;s exit almost certainly signals they are planning on selling oil in other currencies (probably the Chinese yuan). It&#x27;s also a sign of the UAE wanting out of the partnership it&#x27;s enjoyed with the US and it&#x27;s allies.
    • letmevoteplease58 minutes ago
      OPEC has no rules requiring its members to sell oil in US dollars. Iran and Venezuela are members of OPEC.
    • rayiner17 minutes ago
      &gt; OPEC has mostly been a big partner with the US. They are the ones that have mandated using the dollar as the baseline currency for buying and selling OPEC oil.<p>Has anyone ever quantified the benefit the U.S. supposedly gets from dollar denominated oil? How does that compare to the cost to the U.S. of paying cartel pricing for oil? Given that the U.S. is a huge oil consumer, surely the cost to it of cartel pricing in oil is huge.
    • M3L0NM4N18 minutes ago
      It will probably increase total global oil production, which is good for the US consumer (what Trump seems to care about more), but not US producers.
    • bilbo0s55 minutes ago
      In fairness to the UAE, of all the nations of the world, they&#x27;re the ones who have lost the most economically speaking in the current unpleasantness.<p>It&#x27;s kind of unfair.<p>If they can recoup some of those losses selling outside the system in Chinese currency, (or even in US currency), I have to imagine that would provide some ameliorative relief. It won&#x27;t make them whole. They&#x27;ve got a lot of problems right now. But I mean, at least it starts them filling back in the giant hole that everyone else dug for them.
    • techblueberry9 minutes ago
      &gt; I can&#x27;t see how it is actually a win for Trump. OPEC has mostly been a big partner with the US.<p>I mean, I don’t even know if I mean this sarcastically anymore, but are we sure that Trump and the US’ interests are aligned? I think something can be a win for Trump and a loss for the USA.
    • thaumasiotes58 minutes ago
      It&#x27;s a win for Trump in the pretty straightforward sense that it&#x27;s something he publicly announced he wanted.<p>Whether he finds the overall effects positive or negative is a different question.
  • dueltmp_yufsy1 hour ago
    Ok I was initially thinking this would be good for oil prices since they are leaving a cartel, but the article is saying this will just create more uncertainty. Seems we are damned if we do, damned if we don&#x27;t these days.
    • thaumasiotes59 minutes ago
      &gt; Ok I was initially thinking this would be good for oil prices since they are leaving a cartel, but the article is saying this will just create more uncertainty.<p>Where does the article say that? It says this is expected to lower the price of oil.<p>It also says that, because the price of oil is currently unstable, the impact will be difficult to see:<p>&gt; Mazrouei said the move, in which the UAE will also leave the OPEC+ grouping, would not have a huge impact on the market because of the situation in the strait.<p>But it doesn&#x27;t say anywhere that there&#x27;s uncertainty over in which direction this moves the price of oil. The uncertainty is over what the price of oil will be.
    • tamimio34 minutes ago
      Since covid, either way and whatever the event is, it will always be used to increase the prices on consumer’s goods: war, tweets, a giraffe died in Nairobi, it doesn’t matter, prices will go up and never down! It won’t stop unless people, the normal average people, go out in streets rioting against that.
  • ChrisArchitect1 hour ago
    Some more discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47933983">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47933983</a>