9 comments

  • WarOnPrivacy3 hours ago
    I worked on geothermal control systems a decade or so back. There are some less obvious applications for geothermal that reduce electric use (as opposed to generating electricity).<p>The systems I worked on were for cooling larger structures like commercial greenhouses, gov installations and mansions. 64° degree water would be pumped up from 400&#x27; down, run thru a series of chillers (for a&#x2F;c) and then returned underground - about 20° or 25° warmer.<p>I always thought this method could be used to provide a&#x2F;c for neighborhoods, operated as a neighborhood utility. I&#x27;ve not seen it done tho. I&#x27;ve seen neighborhood owned water supplies and sewer systems; it tells me the ownership part seems feasible.
    • wood_spirit3 hours ago
      In the nordics it is common to have ground source heat pumps (brine in closed circuit pipe or bore hole) that are run backwards in summer to cool the house while actually assisting in storing heat back in the ground to extract in the winter. It’s a bit like regenerative breaking on electric cars.
      • jjtheblunt1 hour ago
        There was a new in 1988 house in Champaign, Illinois, USA that used the same system, and i mention that because it was a normal modern house, and it&#x27;s the only one i&#x27;ve heard of with that system.<p>It seems so smart.
    • Animats2 hours ago
      Shallow geothermal works fine for heating. And you can use the ground as a heat sink. But if you want to generate power, you need to get down to where temperatures can boil water. That&#x27;s deeper than most oil wells. Fervo Energy claims to have found 270C at 3350 meters well depth. That&#x27;s progress.
      • lostlogin2 hours ago
        &gt; if you want to generate power, you need to get down to where temperatures can boil water. That&#x27;s deeper than most oil wells.<p>That’s going to be very dependant on location.<p>Here in NZ there are regions where water is boiling at surface level.<p>According to the below, 18% of our power is produced with it.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eeca.govt.nz&#x2F;insights&#x2F;energy-in-new-zealand&#x2F;renewable-energy&#x2F;geothermal&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eeca.govt.nz&#x2F;insights&#x2F;energy-in-new-zealand&#x2F;rene...</a>
      • quijoteuniv1 hour ago
        I think this looks interesting, but still very early stage. The “150 GW revolution” sounds more like theoretical potential, not something we will see soon in real deployment.<p>Main problems: drilling is still expensive, managing induced seismic activity is not trivial, permitting can take long time, and you also need transmission infrastructure. Also not yet proven that companies like Fervo can scale this in reliable and low-cost way.
    • mlwiese1 hour ago
      Framingham, MA has a geothermal system using ground source heat pumps like what you are describing<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.smartcitiesdive.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;first-networked-geothermal-utility-eversource-framingham-building-decarbonization&#x2F;718015&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.smartcitiesdive.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;first-networked-geother...</a>
    • solarpunk2 hours ago
      I think you&#x27;re describing what is known as &quot;district energy&quot; systems.
    • quickthrowman1 hour ago
      District heating and chilled water is uneconomical for single-family homes. It does work well in medium to high density areas.
      • gambiting1 hour ago
        I don&#x27;t know how economical that is, but just as an anecdote - the town I&#x27;m from in Poland has district heating to all single family homes, town of about 20k people. And coincidentally, I now live in the UK and a new estate near me has district heating to all the houses they are building, not apartment blocks. So it must make some sense to someone, or they wouldn&#x27;t be outfitting 100+ houses this way.
        • hunterpayne5 minutes ago
          &quot;I don&#x27;t know how economical that is&quot;<p>Sure you do. Think about it. Its just drilling a hole and making electricity from the heat. We have been able to do this for a very long time. So if people aren&#x27;t really doing it much, its not economical. If it was now becoming economical, the article would describe some new way of doing it that makes it economical. The article doesn&#x27;t, so you &quot;know&quot; it isn&#x27;t.<p>PS This has been tried many time, it only works in very specific situations, usually places where building a full PP doesn&#x27;t make sense or where you are making a lot of electricity for some other purpose (mining usually).
        • mschuster914 minutes ago
          At least in parts of Eastern Europe (especially the former GDR) district heating systems were introduced as a response to the oil crises of the 70s, resulting price shocks and the transport of coal to households being very labor and resource incentive [1].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ndr.de&#x2F;geschichte&#x2F;schauplaetze&#x2F;Windkraft-und-Erdwaerme-Wie-die-DDR-mal-Vorreiter-war,alternativenergie100.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ndr.de&#x2F;geschichte&#x2F;schauplaetze&#x2F;Windkraft-und-Erd...</a>
    • readthenotes13 hours ago
      Isn&#x27;t that similar to how neighborhood heat pumps work?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.araner.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;district-heating-in-sweden-efficiency-innovation" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.araner.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;district-heating-in-sweden-effic...</a>
  • pedalpete19 minutes ago
    According to google, this would be almost 30% of total US energy production (135gw-150gw) and nearly 5% of total US energy consumption.<p>But what is the &quot;breakthrough&quot; if there is one? The article doesn&#x27;t really suggest any breakthrough that is unlocking this potential energy? Or maybe I&#x27;m looking for a technological breakthrough where there isn&#x27;t one.
    • hn_throwaway_9917 minutes ago
      4th paragraph of TFA:<p>&gt; Several companies are now building upon existing techniques for accessing geothermal resources by integrating enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) into operations. While conventional geothermal systems produce energy using hot water or steam, pumped from naturally occurring hydrothermal reservoirs trapped in rock formations underground, EGS use innovative drilling technologies, such as those used in fracking operations, to drill horizontally and create hydrothermal reservoirs where they don’t currently exist.
  • Animats3 hours ago
    Oh, Fervo Energy again. They&#x27;re trying to IPO, hence the hype. Wikipedia&#x27;s warning: <i>This article reads like a press release or a news article and may be largely based on routine coverage. (February 2026) This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia&#x27;s terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia&#x27;s content policies, particularly neutral point of view.</i><p>Here&#x27;s a more realistic evaluation of Fervo.[1]<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.latitudemedia.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;what-fervos-approach-says-about-financing-first-of-a-kind-energy-projects&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.latitudemedia.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;what-fervos-approach-says...</a>
    • w12 hours ago
      This isn’t really an evaluation of the company, just explaining how they had to use different financing approaches as they grew and derisked their technology (which makes sense).<p>Compared to some other new approaches for getting clean base load power, it seems like they’ve been pretty grounded and methodical.
      • Animats10 minutes ago
        They&#x27;re way ahead of the microwave drilling people.<p>There&#x27;s no reason why this shouldn&#x27;t work. But they&#x27;ve been at it for 9 years, with considerable funding, and it doesn&#x27;t really work yet. That&#x27;s a concern.
  • jmward011 hour ago
    Here is an article that is a bit old but discusses the start of things [1]. It would be a bit ironic if fracking tech helped get us further from using natural gas. I think the reality will be if this gets established we will see rapid improvement as scale comes on line so if it is remotely economical now it will be massively better in 5-10 years. Of course the &#x27;if&#x27; applies.<p>[1] (2023) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;time.com&#x2F;6302342&#x2F;fervo-fracking-technology-geothermal-energy&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;time.com&#x2F;6302342&#x2F;fervo-fracking-technology-geotherma...</a>
  • taffydavid3 hours ago
    &gt; Trump has shown support for geothermal energy projects in his second term in office, unlike for other renewable energy sources,<p>He heard there was drilling involved
    • giarc1 hour ago
      You might be joking, but he might just be that simple. Today he seemed to conflate capital punishment with crimes committed in a capital city.
    • ryandrake3 hours ago
      It really is off-brand for this administration. They are only interested in energy sources you pull out of the ground, burn, and turn into CO2&#x2F;pollution.
      • r3trohack3r1 hour ago
        Pretty sure they’re interested in collapsing the cost of domestic energy production in a way that’s resilient to adversarial supply chain risk since energy production is the base of the economic pyramid - energy availability is upstream of nearly all economic output.
        • burkaman1 hour ago
          They have spent immense effort blocking huge amounts of domestic solar and wind production, even paying off developers to simply not build planned power plants.
          • r3trohack3r1 hour ago
            Didn’t know there were significant domestic supply chains for wind, solar, and battery tech. Thought a lions share of that was ultimately coming from China.<p>Have any sources I can learn from?
            • burkaman1 hour ago
              There aren&#x27;t, and there certainly won&#x27;t be if we keep blocking the industry at every turn. Maybe I&#x27;m misunderstanding your point but I don&#x27;t see how this is relevant. Blocking a developer that wants to buy wind turbines from another country and install them in the US does not make domestic energy cheaper or make domestic supply chains more resilient. It&#x27;s a one-time import, once it&#x27;s installed the wind is domestic and free, the most reliable possible supply chain, much more than domestic oil or gas.
              • convolvatron1 hour ago
                I&#x27;m also confused, I thought the US was the leader in basically everything, so much so that they were constantly accusing other countries of stealing technology. now, basic manufacturing is a mysterious unknowable box for which we&#x27;d need to depend on foreign suppliers.
              • r3trohack3r1 hour ago
                Seems fairly measured to say that it’s not in the interest of the U.S. to build its economic foundation (energy production) on top of a technology it’s incapable of producing without the assistance of a country that’s been fairly open about its plans to take kinetic action against the US sometime in the next 48 months.<p>Help me understand.
                • rainsford1 hour ago
                  Really a couple of key points. The first is that the US isn&#x27;t &quot;incapable&quot; of producing renewable energy infrastructure, we&#x27;ve just largely chosen not to for various reasons and are certainly capable of doing so if there was a good reason to.<p>But the second and more important point is that relying on another country to produce renewable energy <i>technology</i> is not analogous to relying on another country to supply your actual energy. If I bought solar panels from China and tomorrow a US-China war started, my solar panels keep producing energy just fine. I might have imported the panels from China, but that&#x27;s not where the actual energy is coming from. Sure, eventually I&#x27;ll need to replace them, but that&#x27;s not for decades. Assuming a conflict with China lasts long enough to prevent me from <i>ever</i> buying Chinese solar panels again, that&#x27;s plenty of time to develop US capacity to produce them. And in the meantime, my solar panels keep importing energy from the Sun, which I&#x27;m told is very hard to blockade, embargo, or tariff.<p>Renewable energy tech actually has another major advantage over fossil fuels in a conflict situation. As the current Middle Eastern unpleasantness has demonstrated, fossil fuels are a global commodity and their price <i>everywhere</i> is impacted by restriction on their trade <i>anywhere</i>. Sufficient domestic production of fossil fuels may prevent a country from literally running out in a war, but that&#x27;s unlikely to actually keep the country&#x27;s economy healthy. China obviously isn&#x27;t sitting on top of a fossil fuel producing region the way Iran is, but it seems pretty obvious a US-China war will dramatically impact fossil fuel energy prices given that blockading fossil fuel trade will be an obvious weapon in such a conflict.<p>When it comes to the impact conflicts have on the price of your energy, you might be better off relying on your Chinese solar panels than American oil. Especially if you can replace them with American solar panels when the time comes. China clearly understands the strategic value of renewable energy, which is why they&#x27;ve invested so much in becoming the major source of that technology.
                  • r3trohack3r43 minutes ago
                    Just wanted to say thanks for this. You connected two trains of thought I had never put together.<p>Don’t have a rebuttal.<p>I’m long on last mile energy production. Solar&#x2F;battery for domestic, nuclear for industrial, etc. It creates resilience through decentralization. It also is likely to happen organically (no central planning necessary, markets will likely naturally converge here as they drive down prices).<p>Haven’t spent much time reconciling that with my stance _against_ centralized wind&#x2F;solar&#x2F;battery in critical infrastructure in the U.S.<p>Will think about this for a while, thanks!
                  • 3eb7988a166358 minutes ago
                    I saw an amusing analysis which said that Trump will go down in history as the clean energy president. No administration will ever do so much to prove the necessity of having renewable energy.<p>When one leader can cause a global energy crisis, seems obvious the world will go running towards any solution which can mitigate this in the future.
                    • breakyerself29 minutes ago
                      It&#x27;s a lesson the US won&#x27;t be able to learn until it has administration capable of learning.
                • amanaplanacanal1 hour ago
                  So if something goes wrong between the US and China, the US has 10 years to develop it&#x27;s own supply. It&#x27;s not like existing panels and batteries are going to suddenly stop working.
                  • r3trohack3r1 hour ago
                    Fair point. But, simultaneously:<p>* I’m skeptical of the U.S. being able to develop domestic supply chains for this under current conditions<p>* “Kinetic action” does imply large swaths of U.S. infrastructure will in fact “suddenly stop working” and need to be rebuilt to maintain capacity
                    • refulgentis36 minutes ago
                      That&#x27;s fair: as a 3rd party it seems like there&#x27;s miscommunication leading to impasse, help me understand:<p>&gt; skeptical of the U.S. being able to develop domestic supply chains for this under current conditions<p>Right, but, the presupposition there is war, and we have to build it ourselves, presupposes <i>differing</i> conditions. Then there are ameliorations that bridge to your desired conditions mentioned by your interlocutors (stuff still works, 10 year head start)<p>&gt; “Kinetic action” does imply large swaths of U.S. infrastructure will in fact “suddenly stop working” and need to be rebuilt to maintain capacity<p>This relies on a maximal reading of the already-maximal &quot;[They have open] plans to take kinetic action against the US [in next 4 years].&quot;. I assume they is China, and you are referring to a Taiwan scenario. I haven&#x27;t seen <i>anyone</i> claim China is going to attack the US in the next 4 years. It is extremely unlikely China ends up knocking out tons of stateside power infrastructure over Taiwan.
            • amanaplanacanal1 hour ago
              If you install solar panels, you have 10 years or more of lifetime to develop your domestic supply chain for replacements. This doesn&#x27;t sound like a problem.
            • 3eb7988a16631 hour ago
              The IRA had enormous incentives to develop on shore renewable manufacturing. All of that was gutted in the BBB. Many of those burgeoning companies may have died in the interim as they saw that funding dry up, and realized they were working in an uphill regulatory environment.
        • bmitch302051 minutes ago
          When you have a supply chain failure on solar or wind power, you stop adding capacity. When you have a supply chain failure on oil and gas, you stop generating power. These are not the same problem.<p>We can build capacity to manufacturer renewable power domestically. But I suspect this administration is more interested in protecting the business interest of those that gave them the largest campaign donations than they are in long term energy sustainability.
        • breakyerself33 minutes ago
          They&#x27;re interested in protecting the profits of industries that line their pockets. It&#x27;s the most corrupt administration in US history and it isn&#x27;t even close. Theres some far right ideology mixed in. Particularly from Stephen Miller, but mostly it&#x27;s grift and graft
      • tialaramex2 hours ago
        It has exclusivity which might be enough, you can&#x27;t own the sun (modulo Simpsons episode) but you <i>might</i> be able to &quot;own&quot; geological hotspots for this purpose, the same way you can &quot;own&quot; a coal mine or an oil well. Remember the goal here is to create poverty. I mean, obviously you say you want to create &quot;wealth&quot; but only in a relative sense.
      • ch4s32 hours ago
        They&#x27;re pretty friendly to nuclear which comes out of the ground.
    • mmooss1 hour ago
      Seriously, I wonder about why it&#x27;s supported. Maybe the drillers are from the fossil fuel extraction industry.
      • D-Coder1 hour ago
        &gt; Seriously, I wonder about why it&#x27;s supported.<p>$$$.
  • davidw1 hour ago
    There&#x27;s one of those sites near where I live. The numbers would be amazing if true, but feel a lot like &quot;to good to be true&quot; to me<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.opb.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;2025&#x2F;10&#x2F;06&#x2F;super-hot-rocks-geothermal-technology-renewable-energy-three-rivers-mazama&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.opb.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;2025&#x2F;10&#x2F;06&#x2F;super-hot-rocks-geoth...</a>
  • aaron6951 hour ago
    [dead]
  • mskogly2 hours ago
    The whole continent of America made a breakthrough?
    • ButlerianJihad1 hour ago
      Yes. North America.<p>United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (formerly NAFTA)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;United_States%E2%80%93Mexico%E2%80%93Canada_Agreement" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;United_States%E2%80%93Mexico%E...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ghy.com&#x2F;trade-compliance&#x2F;guidance-on-us-energy-imports-from-canada&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ghy.com&#x2F;trade-compliance&#x2F;guidance-on-us-energy-i...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.heritage.org&#x2F;trade&#x2F;report&#x2F;analysis-the-united-states-mexico-canada-agreement" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.heritage.org&#x2F;trade&#x2F;report&#x2F;analysis-the-united-st...</a>
    • mc321 hour ago
      You know how the United Arab Emirates are known as the Emirates, how the United Mexican Sates are known as Mexico and how the United States of America is known as America? Are you unfamiliar with what synecdoche is?