7 comments

  • Steve61 hour ago
    I migrated from Firefox to Brave years ago, and it&#x27;s been incredible. It&#x27;s easy to turn off the crypto stuff and turn on more advanced privacy protection. Then it&#x27;s just a fast browser with awesome adblocking.<p>My favorite recent feature has been Brave Scriptlets, which are just little javascript functions you can run on specific sites. I&#x27;ve replaced most of the add ons I used with small scripts. Pretty nice.<p>I would prefer an engine not built on Chromium... but I&#x27;ve lost faith in Mozilla. I&#x27;m glad that Firefox added a built in adblock engine, but it seems too late too late. Brave has been awesome, and being Chromium based gives them time to keep working on stuff that matters.
    • abdullahkhalids28 minutes ago
      The Greasemonkey Firefox addon that allows you to run site specific JS has been around for two decades [1].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.greasespot.net&#x2F;2005&#x2F;03&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.greasespot.net&#x2F;2005&#x2F;03&#x2F;</a>
    • armada65132 minutes ago
      &gt; It&#x27;s easy to turn off the crypto stuff<p>I&#x27;m living under a rock, but my first thought was that you turned off TLS.
      • devsda5 minutes ago
        As a developer, personally I would be worried if that wasn&#x27;t my first thought when someone uses browser and crypto together :D
      • the-grump23 minutes ago
        If your mind goes to TLS when you read crypto, you surely do live under a rock ... in bliss.
    • esperent1 hour ago
      Even better now that they have a paid offering with all that crap stripped out (Brave Origin) which is free on Linux.
      • pogue1 hour ago
        Everyone has made these Brave debloat tools that basically do the same thing as their ridiculous Origin offering.<p>To sell for $60 a web browser that technically has all the features <i>removed</i> is a pretty goofy move.
        • cr125rider41 minutes ago
          Eh that’s a common business model. Pay to get the ads removed is basically the same thing.
          • pogue37 minutes ago
            Well, I&#x27;ll link to this video review by Techlore.<p><i>Brave Just Released a Paid Browser: Here&#x27;s What You Need to Know</i> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=3i5KH0l895o" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=3i5KH0l895o</a>
  • devsda2 hours ago
    I hope this isn&#x27;t a precursor to removing support for other AdBlock addons(MV2) citing native availability of an AdBlock engine and then gradually shift to acceptable ads etc.
    • OsrsNeedsf2P1 hour ago
      The day Firefox drops MV2 is the day I find a new browser. We&#x27;re already at &lt;1% usershare, it&#x27;s not like there&#x27;s safety in numbers here
      • pogue1 hour ago
        I&#x27;d be genuinely curious what you could switch to that still has MV2 because, AFAIK, Firefox is the last holdout.<p>Brave still allows you to install uBlock &amp; some other extensions that should technically not be supported under MV3, but they still ship it with support for those.<p>Just heard about Helium browser, which is just dechromium + uBlock and it&#x27;s still beta.
        • nuker7 minutes ago
          &gt; Firefox is the last holdout.<p>Nope, FF is being infiltrated by adtech for last year or two. Last holdout is Safari now :)
        • cookiengineer56 minutes ago
          &gt; I&#x27;d be genuinely curious what you could switch to that still has MV2 because, AFAIK, Firefox is the last holdout.<p>My last hope is ladybird right now, I don&#x27;t use Firefox or Chrome as my main browsers anymore, and use them only within temporary sandboxes. Without history, without cookies, without logins for the most part.
          • el_io35 minutes ago
            Ladybird supports MV2? I had no idea they have extensions.
          • pogue40 minutes ago
            You use ladybird as your primary web browser? And it works?
            • cookiengineer25 minutes ago
              For the most part, it doesn&#x27;t. It&#x27;s not a consumer ready browser, but a pretty nice little rendering engine. If you use ladybird as bindings, it&#x27;s a bit unstable right now because they are refactoring a lot of parts in the codebase.<p>I built my own tools on top of it, mostly to use internet websites and selfhosted kiwix archives with my local agentic env.<p>I guess what I am saying is that I don&#x27;t have a primary browser anymore. Not a browser where I just can trust it that it doesn&#x27;t do shit with my data. Being able to selfhost kiwix is a superb internet experience if you build your own search dashboard for it, I can fully recommend it.<p>Have to merge my things upstream with ZIMdex when I have the time (probably around June).<p>[1] WIP <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;cookiengineer&#x2F;exocomp" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;cookiengineer&#x2F;exocomp</a><p>[2] WIP <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;cookiengineer&#x2F;zimdex" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;cookiengineer&#x2F;zimdex</a>
    • zephyreon1 hour ago
      Could definitely be writing on the wall that MV2 support will be deprecated in the future but imo not necessarily a bad thing if it’s not actively developed anyways. Maintaining both MV2 &amp; MV3 support isn’t easily sustainable long term when you factor in the need to prioritize other features.<p>That said, if this is writing on the wall I’d hope they’ll listen to the community this time and allow the engine to be extended &#x2F; make it such that a block all ads feature always exists. I’m cautiously optimistic given Mozilla’s track record just over the past year-ish. They have released some great new features that help bring Firefox closer to feature parity with other browsers.<p>I am a Firefox hopeful and recently switched back to using it as my daily driver when Arc went belly up (but mainly for uBlock Origin support).
      • charleslmunger1 hour ago
        &gt;Maintaining both MV2 &amp; MV3 support isn’t easily sustainable long term when you factor in the need to prioritize other features.<p>There is no feature Firefox provides that is more differentiating than ublock origin. As long as pages load and security issues are patched it is the reason to choose Firefox as a browser. What would they prioritize over it?
        • zephyreon1 hour ago
          I’d like to see more investment in their new profile manager. It feels pretty barebones at the moment. Arc had the ability to link profiles to “spaces” and you could easily switch between them without opening a new window. It was very nice to so easily swap between personal, work, &amp; side business.
          • collabs41 minutes ago
            The multi user containers are also very nice.
      • Dylan168071 hour ago
        &gt; Maintaining both MV2 &amp; MV3 support isn’t easily sustainable long term when you factor in the need to prioritize other features.<p>The feature that better adblockers need is one callback that&#x27;s similar to one that&#x27;s still in V3. It&#x27;s not difficult to keep if it&#x27;s your own codebase.
      • striking51 minutes ago
        Try Zen! Firefox fork with Arc-like UX.
        • pjjpo22 minutes ago
          Zen is great and still mostly Firefox. I use standard Firefox on Android and everything syncs without hassle. The experience is so much better that personally cannot imagine using Chromium anymore. Of course I do wonder if the entire Firefox ecosystem is sustainable long-term funding wise.
  • gbil53 minutes ago
    If this means that they release a iOS version with the same Adblock features as brave then I’m sold. I use essentially all OSs and I want a browser with basic features like adblocking&#x2F;custom filters on all the platforms and currently Firefox fails this on iOS devices. Still I believe the Firefox sync is much more robust than eg. Brave one , among various platforms. But then I will also need Firefox to fix keyboard shortcuts on Android which they had until the Fenix rebase some years ago and still haven’t fixed since
  • gtrevorjay1 hour ago
    This feels like a betrayal of their ousting of Eich in the first place. I can&#x27;t imagine a world I would do this and be able to look at myself in the mirror.
    • Paul-Craft22 minutes ago
      I can certainly imagine such a world. I don&#x27;t use Brave because I don&#x27;t want to support Brendan Eich.
    • yborg44 minutes ago
      &gt;&quot;their&quot;<p>It&#x27;s an entirely different management team.
  • MrAlex9459 minutes ago
    I think people are reading into this too much - I don’t think Mozilla would ever implement an actual full spectrum ad blocker (although who knows with the new direction Firefox is headed), this will likely be used as an improvement&#x2F;replacement for the current tracking protection implementation.<p>Weirdly enough, the same time this was added to Geckko is when I started implementing the adblock-rs library for Waterfox - I stumbled across the bindings by accident when using searchfox on the main branch instead of esr140! Quite the coincidence doing it at the same time.
  • nextaccountic2 hours ago
    Does this benefit people that use uBlock Origin?<p>Maybe uBlock Origin for Firefox could be updated to make use of this
    • toofy1 hour ago
      sounds like it just uses ublocks lists.<p>though it doesn’t seem to work as well as ublock, the ad slots are still there with just the ad missing so there’s a giant ugly blank spot.
      • fabrice_d1 hour ago
        Probably because they don&#x27;t leverage cosmetic filtering yet: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.rs&#x2F;adblock&#x2F;latest&#x2F;adblock&#x2F;struct.Engine.html#method.url_cosmetic_resources" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.rs&#x2F;adblock&#x2F;latest&#x2F;adblock&#x2F;struct.Engine.html#me...</a>
  • fishgoesblub1 hour ago
    It&#x27;s surprising, and disappointing that this hasn&#x27;t happened sooner. A real shame that it took a browser company other than Mozilla to make (In Rust no less!) adblock-rust. I wonder if this could&#x27;ve been a native Firefox feature and selling point years ago if Eich wasn&#x27;t kicked out.