> 25K parameters is about 70 million times smaller than GPT-4. It will produce broken sentences. That's the point - the architecture works at this scale.<p>Since it seems to just produce broken and nonsensical sentences (at least based on the one example given) I'm not sure if it <i>does</i> work at this scale.<p>Anyway, as written this passage doesn't really make a whole lot of sense (the <i>point</i> is that it produces broken sentences?), and given that it was almost certainly written by an AI, it demonstrates that the architecture doesn't work especially well at <i>any</i> scale (I kid, I kid).
I love these counterfactual creations on old hardware. It highlights the magical freedom of creativity of software.
Just reminded me of the random sentence generator program on my Vic-20. I had changed most of the words to all the bad words a preteen could think up. So many laughs with the neighborhood kids.
You can chat with the model on the project page: <a href="https://indiepixel.de/meful/index.html" rel="nofollow">https://indiepixel.de/meful/index.html</a><p>It (v3) mostly only says hello and bye, but I guess for 25k parameters you can't complain. (I think the rather exuberant copy is probably the product of Claude et al.)
This would have blown me away back in the late 80s/early 90s.<p>(Or maybe not, if it doesn't perform better than random, I haven't actually tried it out yet. Some more examples would have been nice!)<p>I wonder how far you could push this while still staying period correct, e.g. by adding a REU (RAM Expansion Unit), or even a GeoRAM (basically a REU on steroids).<p>SuperCPU would also be an option, but for me it's always blurring the line of "what is a C64" a bit too much, and it likely just makes it faster anyway.
How fast is the “new” Commodore 64?<p>Have not heard much about it since launch. Although, now that I look, it seems they are just shipping now.<p><a href="https://www.commodore.net/product-page/commodore-64-ultimate-basic-beige-batch2" rel="nofollow">https://www.commodore.net/product-page/commodore-64-ultimate...</a>
Interesting, I’ve always thought neural network progress was primarily bottlenecked by compute.<p>If it turns out that LLM-like models can produce genuinely useful outputs on something as constrained as a Commodore 64—or even more convincingly, if someone manages to train a capable model within the limits of hardware from that era—it would suggest we may have left a lot of progress on the table. Not just in terms of efficiency, but in how we framed the problem space for decades.
<p><pre><code> YOU> hey
C64> HELLO! RE SOUNDS ME. MEFUL!
</code></pre>
60s per token for that doesn't strike me as genuinely useful.<p>Very, very cool project though!
Next-word prediction features always existed for flip phones...
If you're running this in VICE, run it under the SuperCPU with warp mode on.
That's a good idea because, although I love this, 1 minute per token is absolutely savage. Whereas if you can juice the performance you're into semi-credible Jar Jar Binks simulator territory.<p>It does also make me wonder what you could do with somewhat more powerful retro hardware. I'd love to see what a transformer running on a PSX or an N64 could do.
Dissapointed - there was no 6502 code in the GitHub repo.
How does this compare to ELIZA?
ELIZA is better, because this doesn't seem to generate anything coherent. You can try the original ELIZA with DOCTOR script here: <a href="https://anthay.github.io/eliza.html" rel="nofollow">https://anthay.github.io/eliza.html</a>
Jopsph Weizenbaum's ELIZA was rule-based and ran on even slower (1960s) hardware, but because it relied on simple pattern matching instead of neural nets, it would easily have been more responsive (the Emacs editor/operating system has an implementation included, start it with: M-x doctor RETURN).<p>ELIZA was not written in assembler, but (different versions) in COMIT, FORTRAN and LISP.<p><a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/365153.365168" rel="nofollow">https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/365153.365168</a>
Eliza called, and asked if we saw her grand kids...
Load”*”,8,1<p>Brings back memories
Ok now we need 1541 flash attention.<p>I'm not sure what the venn diagram of knowledge to understand what that sentence is suggesting looks like, it's probably more crowded in the intersection than one might think.
i hate ai, and i love the c64, but i'll allow it.
but can you make mac keyboards feel like a c64c?