So this is pretty devastating to my general workflows [1] right now, and poorly timed to boot, with no wind-down at all.<p>It was clear (see the linked post from 70 days ago) that the current offering was unsustainable, but I'm a bit taken aback at how sharp the clawback is.<p>[1] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46938246">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46938246</a>
I really dislike these AI middleman plans. The value-add that Microsoft brings to Github Copilot is near zero compared to directly buying from Anthropic or OpenAI, where 99% of the value is being delivered from. I don't understand why anyone would want to deal with Microsoft as a vendor if they don't have to. The short period of discounted usage was always the obvious rug pull.
> I don't understand why anyone would want to deal with Microsoft as a vendor if they don't have to.<p>It can bill to our Azure sub and I don't have to go through the internal bureaucracy of purchasing a new product/service from a new vendor.
Because if you’re a vscode user up until a couple days ago you could hammer Opus 4.6 all day every day and pay nowhere close to the Claude Max plan. Many people exploited this and the subsidy is closing.
I have thought about making a product out of something I'm building and trying to make the cost of my product a percentage on top of whatever I could resell Anthropic or OpenAI (or whatever) tokens for. I get this may be unpopular, maybe I should just stick with BYO-key.
one subscription for access to most of the models..
I was accounting for that in the 1% of value. I don't see a ton of value in this for development, you end up just always using the smartest model, with maybe tuning subagents to slightly dumber but much faster model. You really only need one subscription to the provider of the smartest model, with maybe 30 minutes of setup time to switch over if SOTA ever switches back to OpenAI.
It makes enterprise deployments much easier because most orgs already have github enterprise.
They will also change the business and enterprise plans to token based: <a href="https://www.wheresyoured.at/news-microsoft-to-shift-github-copilot-users-to-token-based-billing-reduce-rate-limits-2/" rel="nofollow">https://www.wheresyoured.at/news-microsoft-to-shift-github-c...</a>
Good thing I had just finished migrating all of my workflows to OpenCode for the time being!<p>It's a shame because the VsCode copilot experience is quite good out of the box compared to all of the other harnesses I've used. But with typical lack of transparency, and sudden, harsh changes... What are they thinking?<p>After the restrictive rate limiting they've already instituted, I'm simply cancelling and continuing by using providers directly.
This thread is pretty quiet for what strikes me as a substantial set of changes with, presumably, more substantial changes still to come for anyone not grandfathered into a Pro plan.<p>I get the impression that the intersection of HN posters and Copilot users is quite small in practice; that Claude Code and Codex suck up all the oxygen in this room. But it seems plausible we’ll see similar “true costs greatly exceed our current subscription pricing” from Anthropic and OpenAI someday soon…
Using Copilot Pro with Pi, way better and smarter than using Claude Code. I haven't gotten a single e-mail and just wanted to use Opus (I use Sonnet 95% of the time with Opus for issues where Sonnet is struggling) and got an error message. No prior warning, nothing, I'm pissed. They just rugpulled all paying customers man. I liked Copilot because I can plan my usage over a whole month and I'm not "forced" to use it for a week before hitting limits unlike Claude and Codex.
Anthropic <i>literally</i> just removed Claude Code from their Pro plan today, so you're even more right than you know.
The ux of copilot driving Claude beats Claude Code handily.<p>I never understood the low visibility.<p>Expensive ram is annoying. I don't look forward to expensive ai.
Indeed!<p>I just found out via other news sources, and was surprised I hadn't seen it on HN already.
> more substantial changes still to come for anyone not grandfathered into a Pro plan<p>The change applies to existing subscriptions, some paid a year in advance.
You can get a refund, from the article:<p>> If you hit unexpected limits or these changes just don’t work for you, you can cancel your Pro or Pro+ subscription and you will not be charged for April usage. Please reach out to GitHub support between April 20 and May 20 for a refund.
I have a GitHub Pro subscription, renewed for the 2nd year, and I just found out I can no longer use Opus with it. Opus was one of the reasons I had a subscription in the first place.<p>Opus 4.6 had a 3x multiplier in Pro. Now the new Opus 4.7 model has 7.5x in Pro+, which offers 5x more requests, but costs 4x more than Pro. So now Opus is essentially 2x the price it used to be.<p>It’s likely that Sonnet 4.7 will be the new 3x model in Pro — <a href="https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/changes-to-github-copilot-individual-plans/" rel="nofollow">https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/changes-to-gi...</a><p>This whole thing is a massive asshole move, and probably illegal in all countries with a minimum set of consumer protections.
So much for using my secondary Copilot plan with VSCode to hammer Opus 4.6 on a per-request basis.<p>The joke is on them, though (maybe) because this also means that there's <i>literally</i> no reason to keep that account active.
This is quite the rug pull.<p>I've been using the Pro+ with Opus 4.6 very successfully and being charged 3x rate was mostly acceptable.<p>But removing Opus 4.6 and replacing with Opus 4.7 with a 7x rate is just insane!
It's quite cheap at $10 at 1000 premium requests (1 request is like a plan mode + implementation + tests + commit & push). The only problem is I have already used it all, but was billed on the 3rd day of the month, and have to wait till next month to use it.
Yesterday, Opus 4.6 cost three credits. You can no longer use 4.6 or 4.5.<p>Opus 4.7 is available today for 7.5 credits per prompt.<p>They have also suspended new signups.<p>After testing all of the major IDEs/tools that integrate with LLMs over the last four weeks, I was happy to settle on Copilot. I, and others, seem to be a lot confident in that decision. Especially since there seems to be no refund path for people who prepaid for a year.<p>In my 30+ years online, I've never seen an industry change so much in terms of pricing, service levels, etc, as I have the last two months.<p>I'm really curious where all of this lands, and if AI coding tools will be something that only a small percentage can genuinely afford at a competitive level.
> In my 30+ years online, I've never seen an industry change so much in terms of pricing, service levels, etc, as I have the last two months.<p>Warning: baseless speculation/theorizing ahead.<p>This is the consequence of LLM inference being <i>really</i> expensive to run, and LLM inference companies being <i>really</i> attractive to VCs. The VC silly money means their costs are totally decoupled from revenue for a while, but I guess eventually people look at incomings vs outgoings and start asking questions.<p>Previous big trends like SaaS apps, NFTs, blockchain etc were similarly attractive to VCs (for a period of time at least for the last two, the first one is <i>still</i> pretty attractive to VCs), but nowhere near as expensive to run so the behaviour of the companies running them wasn't quite the same.
AI is still in the "VCs subsidizing everything" -phase.<p>So:<p>- DO use AIs to build tools for yourself faster. If the AI goes away, the dashboard and scripts you made will still work.<p>- DO NOT build your business on top of 3rd party AI services with no way of swapping the backend easily. The question isn't whether there's going to be a "rug-pull", but when it happens. It might be sudden like this one or gradual where they just pump up the price like boiling a frog.
I guess it makes more sense for me to just get Claude Pro instead. I was using my Copilot license only because of Opus 4.6 access as all other models seemed crippled in comparison in Copilot; does not even make sense to upgrade to Pro+ which goes from $10/mo to $40/mo and only gives you access to a model that has 7x the rate - 5x the limit at 7x the rate for 4x the price does not seem appealing at all.
I wouldn't mind this change that much if opus-4.7 worked properly in copilot cli. It keeps stopping mid-thought or task and forces me to waste more prompts for no observable reason.<p>Looks like I'm ending my subscription, good (likely too good, no way my account was even remotely within profitable range) access to opus-4.6 was the only reason I used this at all.
Are you using through regular copilot (the 'local' agent type), or through the separate claude agent type (which I believe you have to activate in your repository settings on github).<p>I had the exact same issues with the latter - randomly stops working, wipes chat history, just generally seems to be totally broken. But the former works totally fine and still lets you select sonnet/opus. My experience was before this recent 4.6 -> 4.7 change though.
Welp. I already added a $20 Claude Pro subscription to complement my $10 Github Copilot Pro subscription and $10 DuckDuckGo Plus. That was partly to show support for Anthropic after the OpenAI/DOD episode, but also because I've been using Opus 4.5 exclusively with Copilot and I figured I should try Claude Code eventually.<p>Now it's going to cost me an upgrade to $39 Github Pro+ to keep using Opus, and even then it's with much higher multipliers. I don't fully understand the extent to which this reflects actual costs for Opus versus Microsoft leveraging network effects to discourage the usage of a competitor.<p>I didn't really want to wander outside of VSCode just yet because I was happy with VSCode/Copilot/Opus-4.5 and I don't want to spend all my time experimenting when stuff is changing so fast. But I guess my hand has been forced.
>$39 Github Pro+ to keep using Opus,<p>For what its worth, i have been paying for Pro+ and i still got locked out of Opus. I only have access to Opus 4.7 at 7.5x
> I didn't really want to wander outside of VSCode just yet because I was happy with VSCode/Copilot/Opus-4.5<p>This was my first thought too but apparently you can just use Claude Code within VSC: <a href="https://code.claude.com/docs/en/vs-code" rel="nofollow">https://code.claude.com/docs/en/vs-code</a>
You can also use Claude Code in a VS Code terminal window, which I much prefer for reasons I can’t quite put my finger on. Granted, I’ve moved to Zed in the past few months. I’m doing the same there.
I've started messing with this and the experience seems pretty similar.
Props to them for being transparent about it.
I consider migrating to claude, what a shame they dont have a github copilot plus like price tier.
This is some shit, coming with 0 notice at the start of a work week. My exposure to Claude is only via Copilot which has worked very well for my purposes. I didn't have to learn a ton for it to just start working. I guess I'll look into other options now as I really want to continue using Opus, but don't have a need to 4x my spend on Copilot quite yet.
I have a GitHub Copilot subscription and this really sucks.<p>I subscribed two months ago, frustrated with Claude Code and their tight session limits.<p>The Copilot offer was unbeatable 100 dollars for a 12 months plan, if I remember correctly.<p>It was pretty clear they were losing money, but hey, it's Microsoft and they need customers, so a competitive push on pricing is expected.<p>Let's see what these limits look like and I'll decide whether to cancel my subscription or not.<p>Still a terrible move from them.
I saw some Reddit rumours going around and locked myself into the yearly Pro+<p>I guess overall probably was a good decision.<p>But 7.5x as well as quota limits is pretty hard to swallow.<p>The annoying thing about the quota limits is they make it really awkward to actually fully utilize the 1500 premium requests you are paying for.<p>Like if you don’t plan working around the daily and weekly quotas you may not actually be able to utilize your full request allocation.<p>Claude has the same issue. Single session blows through the quota.
Worst part is them doing this mid-billing cycle and not at the start of the next in 11 days. I cancelled and requested a refund.
I cannot describe how disappointing it is to be switching to this insane time limit window based pricing. I absolutely abhor that I'll be subjected to 5 hour chunks of time where I'll be limited at some point in that window of time, and be told I'll have to wait. And then there is a weekly limit.<p>That's not how my creative energy works. I have time that I want to solve problems, and I want to solve them. I don't want a cooldown timer applied to solving a problem. Not to mention the anxiety of realizing that while I sleep I could have burned tokens in that time.<p>I'm incredibly disappointed when I sat down to my hobbyist programming time and realized copilot was suddenly and dramatically changed in a way that is incredibly disheartening.<p>Meter my token usage DON'T tell me when I can use them! ARGH.
I cannot understand people still using anthropic models on copilot, when gpt 5.4 is better and 3 to 7 time cheaper. Anthropic quite obviously raised their licensing to the max. You probably can still have a taste of it for a few minutes before being limited on their own subscription.
GPT's output is awful and it gets even more awful when you try to work out a solution "together" because it shits out 10 paragraphs with 20 options instead of focusing and getting things done.
Simple, for what I'm doing Opus 4.6 (and before that, Opus 4.5) are just much better at following my instructions and achieve consistently better results.<p>From what I've been gathering, this split in success seems to depend a lot on the types of tasks, the domains / programming languages / frameworks used, and style of prompting.<p>I couldn't get 5.2 to follow instructions for the life of me, even when repeating multiple times to do / not do something. 5.3-codex was an improvement and 5.4 while _usually_ decent still regularly forgets, goes on unnecessary tangents, or otherwise repeatedly stops just to ask for continuation.<p>Sure, I'm paying 3x more per request, but I'm also doing 5x fewer requests.<p>Or well, used to. Still bummed about them dropping 4.6.
My experience is similar. Opus, especially Opus 4.5, understands my intentions better even when poorly phrased, and more consistently follows my instructions to do only what's necessary and no more.<p>As far as I can tell, the distinctive feature of my workflow is that I'm giving it small, contained single-commit-sized tasks and limited context. For instance: "For all controller `output()` functions under `Controller/Edit/` and `Controller/Report/`, ensure that they check `Auth::userCanManage`." Others seem to be taking bigger swings.
Anecdotally, I experimented GPT-5.4 xhigh and something about the code it wrote just didn't vibe with me.<p>It felt like I constantly have to go back and either fix things or I just didn't like the results. Like the forward momentum/progress on my projects overally wasn't there over time. Even with tho its cheaper it just doesn't feel worth it, to the point I start to feel negative emotions.<p>I'm actually a bit worried that I've somehow become to feel more negative emotions with agentic coding. Quicker to feel frustrated somehow when things aren't working.
Same for me. I would still be happy with my Copilot Pro subscription if I could use 5.4 with 1x coefficient (and 5.4 mini with 0.33x).<p>But seeing that they are stopping to get new subscriptions, and rumours/evidence that they plan to increase coefficients of remaining models, it seems they want us to see "the writing on the wall"
I'm not surprised at all. This was one of the most generous plans out there, offering frankly ridiculous pricing based on a single prompt regardless of turns taken or tokens used. I was subscribed for a month around Christmas and got a shitload of tokens out of Opus 4.5 for a measly $10.
how is it possible to have 126 points and still 26 karma, is it voter ring or bots? @dang
I have Copilot Pro+ and discovered i cannot use Opus anymore today! Are we reaching the end of VC funded productivity?
It's quite telling, they've paused new signups because Microsoft doesn't have enough compute, and they moved Opus to only being accessible on a higher tier because Anthropic doesn't have enough compute either.<p>They're all operating at a loss, enshittification is coming for us all.
Removing access to opus is pretty funny. At least they recognize it’s unacceptable and tell you to go get a refund.<p>The per-request model was pretty insane.
Damn it was good while it lasted, but it was obvious the previous per request pricing scheme was misaligned with their actual costs. MS's product people must be seriously detached from their technical and financial people for it to have even lasted this long (or they're willing to burn a lot of money for the typical "make customers happy and then rug pull" cycle, but hey, Hanlons razor).<p>Given that they've already silently had session + weekly rate limits for the past couple weeks already at least (I've hit them), I wonder if this change is just making them visible to the user, or if it's actually tightening them too.<p>If it's the former then I can say they're still significantly more generous than claude pro (on the pro+ plan), so this might be okay. If it's the latter, and the new limits are similar to claude pro then copilot is going to be significantly less useful to me.