Brilliant! Love seeing this space start to wake up.<p>Last year I built <a href="https://andshake.app" rel="nofollow">https://andshake.app</a> to prevent the need for conflict resolution… by getting things clear up front.<p>I agree that AI has much to offer in low-stakes agreements to help people move forward in cooperation.
Fabulous idea. LLM-assisted mediation is brilliant because it has the potential to bring the benefits of mediation to the masses. The addressable market is all of humanity. Even if all you did was focus this app on co-parenting arguments, you could help millions of people every day.
I would love something like this to use with my HOA. About to start mediation and the estimate for the mediator alone is ~$20k.
You might try Decisionlayer.ai<p>We built a way to make contracts enforceable and resolve disputes without the high cost of litigation. Specifically, by adding our arbitration clause to your contracts or using our "case by consent" you can get AI driven court-enforceable arbitration decisions in 7 days for a $500 flat fee - no lawyers required. This compares to the $30k or $40k you would otherwise spend on a lawyer+ JAMS/AAA arbitration fees. For your HOA, I suspect the case by consent would be the best approach - two parties come to the website, both agree to use DecisionLayer to resolve the dispute and then present the issue and each side's argument.<p>We have free case simulator on our site. Check it out at <a href="https://www.decisionlayer.ai/simulate" rel="nofollow">https://www.decisionlayer.ai/simulate</a>
Its an interesting idea. I've seen a few of these but not with ol' John's spin on it.<p>Do you want the first link "How it Works" to really be just the # of front page? it makes it feel like it's broken if someone clicks it. Also your blog about Nash Bargaining is almost more of a "How it Works" page than the How it Works page is.<p>I feel like your landing page very quickly told me what your website does which is great. If the Nash Bargaining is the "wedge" to separate you from the pack, I'd try explain how that differentiates this over the others as quickly as possible. I know that's easier said than done. Good luck!
How about Iran/US conflict ? or Israel/Palestine conflict ?<p>Is anyone working on this ? seems like a big win for AI if it can be done.
Honestly I’m on Daniel’s side - they agreed on a 50/50 split, and they’ve both been working their asses off to make the business work. It’s an arrangement that clearly both of them have been actively participating in, not trying to push back against, for a year and a half.<p>And the supposed insight this product offers is to… split the difference? Between Maya’s power play for 70/30, and Daniel’s insistence on the original 50/50? 60/40 is the brilliant proposal?<p>I dunno man I’m not buying any of this.<p>How could they stand to work together afterwards, knowing she thinks she deserves 70% of the profit, but was willing to ‘settle’ for 60%? Why would you want to keep working with someone who screwed you over that way? Their partnership is toast. All the mediation really does is… I don’t know, what? How is this good for Daniel? This ain’t any kind of reconciliation, surely.<p>Is the argument that it’d be easier for her to get a new baker, than it is for him to get a new business manager?
I am unable to login